File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Survey on the teaching and use in dental schools of resin-based materials for restoring posterior teeth

TitleSurvey on the teaching and use in dental schools of resin-based materials for restoring posterior teeth
Authors
Keywordsamalgam
dental teaching
Posterior resin composites
Issue Date2011
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595X
Citation
International Dental Journal, 2011, v. 61 n. 1, p. 12-18 How to Cite?
AbstractA survey was conducted of 100 dental schools worldwide to investigate the current teaching of posterior resin composite restorations. A 20 multi-part question questionnaire was emailed to the selected schools. Schools were selected by ability to understand and respond in English. The questionnaire consisted of four open-ended questions and 16 closed questions on topics such as material selection for restoring posterior teeth, preclinical teaching of resin composite for posterior teeth, restoration size, contraindications, matrix placement methods, lining use, adhesive selection and finishing. Forty-six schools responded. The outcomes showed all schools included the teaching of resin composite for posterior restorations but varied. The majority of schools (63%) no longer taught amalgam as the preferred posterior restorative material. Half of the schools surveyed set numerical clinical requirements for restoration placement. Australian schools had no requirements whilst 92% of Asian schools did. There was a consensus that larger restorations were less suitable for resin composite. Selection of adhesives depended on region. Generally, the schools surveyed showed minor variations philosophically in teaching of the use and placement of resin composite restorations. © 2011 FDI World Dental Federation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154661
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.607
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.840
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorStella, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorThong, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorYip, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTyas, MJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:26:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:26:47Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Dental Journal, 2011, v. 61 n. 1, p. 12-18en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-6539en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154661-
dc.description.abstractA survey was conducted of 100 dental schools worldwide to investigate the current teaching of posterior resin composite restorations. A 20 multi-part question questionnaire was emailed to the selected schools. Schools were selected by ability to understand and respond in English. The questionnaire consisted of four open-ended questions and 16 closed questions on topics such as material selection for restoring posterior teeth, preclinical teaching of resin composite for posterior teeth, restoration size, contraindications, matrix placement methods, lining use, adhesive selection and finishing. Forty-six schools responded. The outcomes showed all schools included the teaching of resin composite for posterior restorations but varied. The majority of schools (63%) no longer taught amalgam as the preferred posterior restorative material. Half of the schools surveyed set numerical clinical requirements for restoration placement. Australian schools had no requirements whilst 92% of Asian schools did. There was a consensus that larger restorations were less suitable for resin composite. Selection of adhesives depended on region. Generally, the schools surveyed showed minor variations philosophically in teaching of the use and placement of resin composite restorations. © 2011 FDI World Dental Federation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595Xen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Journalen_US
dc.subjectamalgam-
dc.subjectdental teaching-
dc.subjectPosterior resin composites-
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - Therapeutic Useen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Caries - Therapyen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Etching - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - Methods - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshDentistry, Operative - Educationen_US
dc.subject.meshEducation, Dental - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshSchools, Dental - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshTeaching - Methods - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.titleSurvey on the teaching and use in dental schools of resin-based materials for restoring posterior teethen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00003.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21382028-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952555775en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros185561-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952555775&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage12en_US
dc.identifier.epage18en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288980300004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLiew, Z=37120507400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNguyen, E=37120681200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridStella, R=37121077100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridThong, I=37121146400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYip, N=37121367100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZhang, F=37121361400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyas, MJ=35316181100en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0020-6539-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats