File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Nonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping to facilitate focal pulmonary veins ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

TitleNonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping to facilitate focal pulmonary veins ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Authors
KeywordsCatheter ablation
Fibrillation
Mapping
Issue Date2002
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0147-8389&site=1
Citation
Pace - Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology, 2002, v. 25 n. 1, p. 57-61 How to Cite?
AbstractRF ablation of ectopic foci in the pulmonary veins (PVs) is a promising treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using nonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping of PV during spontaneous or induced ectopy to facilitate focal ablation procedure. The study included 35 patients with drug refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent focal RF ablation of the PV. In 10 (29%) patients, mapping and RF ablation procedures were performed using the nonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping system to enable automatic capture of the location and the timing of the ectopy. As a control, 25 patients underwent conventional endocardial activation mapping technique. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Overall procedural duration was similar between them (199 ± 52 vs 221 ± 82 minutes, P > 0.05). However, the mean fluoroscopy time (25 ± 6 vs 52 ± 12 minutes, P = 0.01) and the mean number of RF applications (5 ± 3 vs 12 ± 9, P = 0.02) were significantly less in patients who underwent electroanatomic mapping. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the acute (90 vs 84%) and long-term success rate (60 vs 56%) after a mean follow-up of 12 ± 9 months. In conclusion, RF ablation of ectopic foci using non fluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping of PVs during spontaneous or induced ectopy is useful even in patients with a limited number of ectopy, and is associated with a similar success rate, but less fluoroscopy time and RF application compared to the conventional approach.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/162584
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.912
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.686
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTse, HFen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, KLFen_US
dc.contributor.authorFan, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorLau, CPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T05:21:25Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-05T05:21:25Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.citationPace - Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology, 2002, v. 25 n. 1, p. 57-61en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/162584-
dc.description.abstractRF ablation of ectopic foci in the pulmonary veins (PVs) is a promising treatment for patients with paroxysmal AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using nonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping of PV during spontaneous or induced ectopy to facilitate focal ablation procedure. The study included 35 patients with drug refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent focal RF ablation of the PV. In 10 (29%) patients, mapping and RF ablation procedures were performed using the nonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping system to enable automatic capture of the location and the timing of the ectopy. As a control, 25 patients underwent conventional endocardial activation mapping technique. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the two groups. Overall procedural duration was similar between them (199 ± 52 vs 221 ± 82 minutes, P > 0.05). However, the mean fluoroscopy time (25 ± 6 vs 52 ± 12 minutes, P = 0.01) and the mean number of RF applications (5 ± 3 vs 12 ± 9, P = 0.02) were significantly less in patients who underwent electroanatomic mapping. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the acute (90 vs 84%) and long-term success rate (60 vs 56%) after a mean follow-up of 12 ± 9 months. In conclusion, RF ablation of ectopic foci using non fluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping of PVs during spontaneous or induced ectopy is useful even in patients with a limited number of ectopy, and is associated with a similar success rate, but less fluoroscopy time and RF application compared to the conventional approach.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0147-8389&site=1en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectCatheter ablation-
dc.subjectFibrillation-
dc.subjectMapping-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAtrial Fibrillation - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshCatheter Ablation - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshElectromagnetic Phenomenaen_US
dc.subject.meshElectrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiacen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPulmonary Veins - Physiopathology - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleNonfluoroscopic magnetic electroanatomic mapping to facilitate focal pulmonary veins ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailTse, HF:hftse@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityTse, HF=rp00428en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00057.x-
dc.identifier.pmid11877938en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036159331en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros115093-
dc.identifier.hkuros74781-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036159331&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage57en_US
dc.identifier.epage61en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000173825600010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTse, HF=7006070805en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, KLF=8624893900en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFan, K=7202978353en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, CP=35275317200en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0147-8389-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats