File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: A study of discourse of professionals in a medical laboratory

TitleA study of discourse of professionals in a medical laboratory
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherInternational Pragmatics Association.
Citation
The 12th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA 2011), Manchester, UK., 3-8 July 2011. In Conference Abstracts, 2011, p. 565 How to Cite?
AbstractMany workplace activities are achieved through talk. It is not surprising that there is a growing body ofliterature on interaction through talk at workplace in various settings (e.g. business, clinical, educational, etc.). However, research on interaction between professionals in laboratory settings in the context of Hong Kong is limited. Drawing on more than 20 hours of audio-recorded interaction between a supervisor and his subordinates, supplemented with interviews and workplace observation, the paper explores interaction patterns between professionals in a medical laboratory in Hong Kong from a conversation analytic perspective. We particularly focus on the sequential structures and linguistic strategies in directive sequences issued from/to the laboratory supervisor to/from his subordinates. We broadly define a directive as an act to get someone to do something. While a directive may be delivered in one single utterance, it is not uncommon to see a directive being sequentially constructed. A directive sequence may include a pre-sequence, the directive turn (which may not be explicitly uttered), information and clarification requests, explanations, and detailed instructions. Moreover, while our data supports what has been reported in the literature that people of high status tend to give a directive in more direct and less polite forms, it seems that at the workplace under investigation, it is also acceptable for the subordinates to use direct and not mitigated forms when requesting the supervisor to do something for them. Participants’ choice of linguistic strategies in giving directives is closed related to the context embedded in the interaction and is the result of negotiation between the interlocutors. The paper has implication for applying conversation analysis to the study of workplace interaction and brings insights into the norms of interaction between laboratory professions in Hong Kong.
DescriptionLecture
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/166878

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorZayts, Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorTang, M-
dc.contributor.authorTam, WK-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T08:51:17Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T08:51:17Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 12th International Pragmatics Conference (IPrA 2011), Manchester, UK., 3-8 July 2011. In Conference Abstracts, 2011, p. 565en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/166878-
dc.descriptionLecture-
dc.description.abstractMany workplace activities are achieved through talk. It is not surprising that there is a growing body ofliterature on interaction through talk at workplace in various settings (e.g. business, clinical, educational, etc.). However, research on interaction between professionals in laboratory settings in the context of Hong Kong is limited. Drawing on more than 20 hours of audio-recorded interaction between a supervisor and his subordinates, supplemented with interviews and workplace observation, the paper explores interaction patterns between professionals in a medical laboratory in Hong Kong from a conversation analytic perspective. We particularly focus on the sequential structures and linguistic strategies in directive sequences issued from/to the laboratory supervisor to/from his subordinates. We broadly define a directive as an act to get someone to do something. While a directive may be delivered in one single utterance, it is not uncommon to see a directive being sequentially constructed. A directive sequence may include a pre-sequence, the directive turn (which may not be explicitly uttered), information and clarification requests, explanations, and detailed instructions. Moreover, while our data supports what has been reported in the literature that people of high status tend to give a directive in more direct and less polite forms, it seems that at the workplace under investigation, it is also acceptable for the subordinates to use direct and not mitigated forms when requesting the supervisor to do something for them. Participants’ choice of linguistic strategies in giving directives is closed related to the context embedded in the interaction and is the result of negotiation between the interlocutors. The paper has implication for applying conversation analysis to the study of workplace interaction and brings insights into the norms of interaction between laboratory professions in Hong Kong.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Pragmatics Association.-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Pragmatics Conference, IPrA 2011en_US
dc.titleA study of discourse of professionals in a medical laboratoryen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailZayts, O: zayts@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityZayts, O=rp01211en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros211134en_US
dc.identifier.spage565-
dc.identifier.epage565-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.customcontrol.immutablesml 130417-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats