Conference Paper: Biomechanical comparative study of the JuggerKnot™ soft anchor technique with other common mallet finger fracture fixation techniques

TitleBiomechanical comparative study of the JuggerKnot™ soft anchor technique with other common mallet finger fracture fixation techniques
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
The 11th international Meeting on Surgical Rehabilitation of the Tetraplegic Upper Limb cum 26th HKSSH Annual Congress and 6th Annual Therapist Symposium of the Hong Kong Society for Hand Therapy (Tetra Hand 2013), Hong Kong, 6-9 June 2013. How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: Bony mallet finger involves an avulsion fracture of the terminal extensor tendon insertion. Most do well with conservative treatment using splinting. Surgical fixation is indicated in open injuries, avulsion fracture involving at least one third of the articular surface and failed splinting treatment. Both treatment methods have limitations. Usual splinting protocol requires 6 weeks of full-time use and another 6 weeks for weaning. They are cumbersome, have compliance issues and most result in extension lag. Currently, there is no biomechanical sound repair that can allow mobilization after fixation and thus most result in loss of flexion range. This study was designed to compare the peak load resistance of the JuggerKnot™ (Biomet) soft anchor fixation to other fixation methods (Kirschner wire, pull-out wire, tension-band wiring) and to assess whether the suture anchor technique can allow early mobilization without protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different fixation techniques were assigned among twenty-four specimens (all fingers, no thumbs) from six cadaveric human hands in a randomized block fashion. Only one technique was performed on each finger. A downward load was applied to flex the distal phalanx and the maximum loading force was recorded. The load was tested at 30 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees of flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint. Two separate data sets were performed for each finger before and after the osteotomy and fixation. The data underwent Shapiro-Wilk normality testing before analysis. The values of the mean peak load of the four groups were compared using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULTS: All data points passed the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. The mean peak load of the tension-band wiring group was 67.8N at 60 degrees of flexion which was significantly higher than the other three groups (p=0.008). The JuggerKnot™ fixation had mean peak loads of 13.35N (30°), 22.51N (45°) and 32.96N (60°) which were all above the required load for mobilization. No complications of implant failure or fragmentation of the dorsal fragment was noted. CONCLUSION: Tension-band wiring was the strongest fixation method but most technically demanding. The JuggerKnot™ soft anchor fixation was the most user-friendly, does not require trans-articular Kirschner wire fixation for protection and allows for safe immediate mobilization of the joint after fixation. Future studies are required to assess the fatigue strength of the fixation and the applicability in the clinical setting.
DescriptionHKSSH Free Paper - Local Paper no. O126
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183913

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JPY-
dc.contributor.authorFung, BKK-
dc.contributor.authorIp, WY-
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T04:27:30Z-
dc.date.available2013-06-18T04:27:30Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationThe 11th international Meeting on Surgical Rehabilitation of the Tetraplegic Upper Limb cum 26th HKSSH Annual Congress and 6th Annual Therapist Symposium of the Hong Kong Society for Hand Therapy (Tetra Hand 2013), Hong Kong, 6-9 June 2013.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/183913-
dc.descriptionHKSSH Free Paper - Local Paper no. O126-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Bony mallet finger involves an avulsion fracture of the terminal extensor tendon insertion. Most do well with conservative treatment using splinting. Surgical fixation is indicated in open injuries, avulsion fracture involving at least one third of the articular surface and failed splinting treatment. Both treatment methods have limitations. Usual splinting protocol requires 6 weeks of full-time use and another 6 weeks for weaning. They are cumbersome, have compliance issues and most result in extension lag. Currently, there is no biomechanical sound repair that can allow mobilization after fixation and thus most result in loss of flexion range. This study was designed to compare the peak load resistance of the JuggerKnot™ (Biomet) soft anchor fixation to other fixation methods (Kirschner wire, pull-out wire, tension-band wiring) and to assess whether the suture anchor technique can allow early mobilization without protection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four different fixation techniques were assigned among twenty-four specimens (all fingers, no thumbs) from six cadaveric human hands in a randomized block fashion. Only one technique was performed on each finger. A downward load was applied to flex the distal phalanx and the maximum loading force was recorded. The load was tested at 30 degrees, 45 degrees and 60 degrees of flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint. Two separate data sets were performed for each finger before and after the osteotomy and fixation. The data underwent Shapiro-Wilk normality testing before analysis. The values of the mean peak load of the four groups were compared using the one-way analysis of variance test. RESULTS: All data points passed the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality. The mean peak load of the tension-band wiring group was 67.8N at 60 degrees of flexion which was significantly higher than the other three groups (p=0.008). The JuggerKnot™ fixation had mean peak loads of 13.35N (30°), 22.51N (45°) and 32.96N (60°) which were all above the required load for mobilization. No complications of implant failure or fragmentation of the dorsal fragment was noted. CONCLUSION: Tension-band wiring was the strongest fixation method but most technically demanding. The JuggerKnot™ soft anchor fixation was the most user-friendly, does not require trans-articular Kirschner wire fixation for protection and allows for safe immediate mobilization of the joint after fixation. Future studies are required to assess the fatigue strength of the fixation and the applicability in the clinical setting.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTetra Hand 2013-
dc.relation.ispartof2013四肢瘫的手功能重建及康复国际会议暨香港手外科学会周年大会及香港手部复康疗治学会第六屇周年研讨会-
dc.titleBiomechanical comparative study of the JuggerKnot™ soft anchor technique with other common mallet finger fracture fixation techniques-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFung, BKK: bkkfung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailIp, WY: wyip@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, JPY=rp01685-
dc.identifier.authorityIp, WY=rp00401-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros214868-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats