File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Provisional and complex techniques for bifurcation treatment - Trading apposition for scaffolding?

TitleProvisional and complex techniques for bifurcation treatment - Trading apposition for scaffolding?
Authors
KeywordsBifurcations
Malapposition
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Two-stent strategies
Issue Date2012
Citation
Interventional Cardiology (London), 2012, v. 7 n. 1, p. 44-48 How to Cite?
AbstractProvisional T-stenting with stenting of the main branch and optional side branch (SB) stenting in the case of significant SB occlusion with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow <3 is the strategy chosen nowadays by most interventionalists for treating simple bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex true bifurcation lesions remains, however, the subject of debate: treatment of complex bifurcation lesions requires more time than treatment of simple bifurcations and can lead to significantly higher rates of restenosis, target lesion revascularisation and myocardial infarction. Current bifurcation techniques often fail to ensure continuous stent coverage of the SB ostium and of the two bifurcation branches without a simultaneous increase in the rate of malapposed struts. Stent struts left unapposed in the lumen disturb blood flow and are increasingly recognised as increasing the risk of stent thrombosis and focal in-stent restenosis, limiting the success of stent procedures in these lesions. New technology and dedicated designs may, in the near future, overcome such limitations of conventional two-stent bifurcation strategies. © TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2012.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/194368
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.832

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFoin, N-
dc.contributor.authorAlegria-Barrero, E-
dc.contributor.authorTorii, R-
dc.contributor.authorChan, PH-
dc.contributor.authorJain, AK-
dc.contributor.authorDavies, JE-
dc.contributor.authorDi Mario, C-
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T03:32:30Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-30T03:32:30Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationInterventional Cardiology (London), 2012, v. 7 n. 1, p. 44-48-
dc.identifier.issn1756-1477-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/194368-
dc.description.abstractProvisional T-stenting with stenting of the main branch and optional side branch (SB) stenting in the case of significant SB occlusion with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow <3 is the strategy chosen nowadays by most interventionalists for treating simple bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex true bifurcation lesions remains, however, the subject of debate: treatment of complex bifurcation lesions requires more time than treatment of simple bifurcations and can lead to significantly higher rates of restenosis, target lesion revascularisation and myocardial infarction. Current bifurcation techniques often fail to ensure continuous stent coverage of the SB ostium and of the two bifurcation branches without a simultaneous increase in the rate of malapposed struts. Stent struts left unapposed in the lumen disturb blood flow and are increasingly recognised as increasing the risk of stent thrombosis and focal in-stent restenosis, limiting the success of stent procedures in these lesions. New technology and dedicated designs may, in the near future, overcome such limitations of conventional two-stent bifurcation strategies. © TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2012.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInterventional Cardiology (London)-
dc.subjectBifurcations-
dc.subjectMalapposition-
dc.subjectPercutaneous coronary intervention-
dc.subjectTwo-stent strategies-
dc.titleProvisional and complex techniques for bifurcation treatment - Trading apposition for scaffolding?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84862551642-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage44-
dc.identifier.epage48-
dc.identifier.issnl1756-1485-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats