File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1086/648064
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77149143916
- WOS: WOS:000274017300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Constructive empiricism and deflationary truth
Title | Constructive empiricism and deflationary truth |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Citation | Philosophy of Science, 2009, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-443 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Constructive empiricists claim to offer a reconstruction of the aim and practice of science without adopting all the metaphysical commitments of scientific realism. Deflationists about truth boast of the ability to offer a full account of the nature of truth without adopting the metaphysical commitments accompanying substantive accounts. Though the two views would form an attractive package, I argue that the pairing is not possible: constructive empiricism requires a substantive account of truth. I articulate what sort of account of truth and empirical adequacy the constructive empiricist must offer and then show why deflationists cannot uphold such an account. Copyright 2009 by the Philosophy of Science Association. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/202142 |
ISSN | 2021 Impact Factor: 1.752 2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.040 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Asay, Jamin | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-08-22T02:57:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-22T02:57:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Philosophy of Science, 2009, v. 76, n. 4, p. 423-443 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8248 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/202142 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Constructive empiricists claim to offer a reconstruction of the aim and practice of science without adopting all the metaphysical commitments of scientific realism. Deflationists about truth boast of the ability to offer a full account of the nature of truth without adopting the metaphysical commitments accompanying substantive accounts. Though the two views would form an attractive package, I argue that the pairing is not possible: constructive empiricism requires a substantive account of truth. I articulate what sort of account of truth and empirical adequacy the constructive empiricist must offer and then show why deflationists cannot uphold such an account. Copyright 2009 by the Philosophy of Science Association. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophy of Science | - |
dc.title | Constructive empiricism and deflationary truth | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/648064 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77149143916 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 76 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 423 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 443 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000274017300001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0031-8248 | - |