File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: Clinical utility of ethnic-based diabetes risk scores for predicting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus among Chinese patients with impaired fasting glucose in primary care setting in Hong Kong

TitleClinical utility of ethnic-based diabetes risk scores for predicting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus among Chinese patients with impaired fasting glucose in primary care setting in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherNorth American Primary Care Research Group.
Citation
The 2014 Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG), New York, NY., 21-25 November 2014. How to Cite?
AbstractContext: Risk stratification based on the presence of concurrent risk factors deems a cost-effective approach to identify those patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) at highest risk of diabetes to undergo further confirmatory testing in primary care setting. At present, two non-laboratory-based risk assessment algorithms for diabetes have been developed for Chinese. Objective: To evaluate the performance of Qingdao Diabetes Prevention Program Risk Score and New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score in predicting the presence of diabetes diagnosed by OGTT among Chinese patients with IFG. Design: Cross-sectional study Setting: Two primary care out-patient clinics in Hong Kong Patients: 464 Chinese patients with IFG at baseline (i.e. fasting blood glucose level between 5.6-6.9mmol/L documented in their record within 18 months before date of attendance, without known diagnosis of diabetes and not taking any anti-diabetic medications) Instruments: Two risk algorithms, Qingdao Diabetes Prevention Program Risk Score (Gao, 2010) and New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score (Zhou, 2013) Outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity at the recommended optimal cutoff point. Results: Overall, 94 (20.2%) patients had undiagnosed diabetes. The AUC of the two above risk scores were 0.544 and 0.521 respectively, indicating the poor diagnostic accuracy for their use among our IFG patients to predict the presence of diabetes diagnosed by OGTT. At the optimal cutoff point, the sensitivity/specificity of risk scores for predicting undiagnosed DM was 91.5%/9.7% and 100%/3.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Although these two risk scores were derived from Chinese populations, they seemed more applicable to the general population rather than patients with IFG. A different algorithm should be developed to aid identification of those IFG patients with highest diabetic risk for further testing and to avoid unnecessary OGTT for the lower risk group.
DescriptionNo. DB27
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/207455

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, EYTen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, CKHen_US
dc.contributor.authorJiao, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-19T13:14:01Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-19T13:14:01Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 2014 Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG), New York, NY., 21-25 November 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/207455-
dc.descriptionNo. DB27-
dc.description.abstractContext: Risk stratification based on the presence of concurrent risk factors deems a cost-effective approach to identify those patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) at highest risk of diabetes to undergo further confirmatory testing in primary care setting. At present, two non-laboratory-based risk assessment algorithms for diabetes have been developed for Chinese. Objective: To evaluate the performance of Qingdao Diabetes Prevention Program Risk Score and New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score in predicting the presence of diabetes diagnosed by OGTT among Chinese patients with IFG. Design: Cross-sectional study Setting: Two primary care out-patient clinics in Hong Kong Patients: 464 Chinese patients with IFG at baseline (i.e. fasting blood glucose level between 5.6-6.9mmol/L documented in their record within 18 months before date of attendance, without known diagnosis of diabetes and not taking any anti-diabetic medications) Instruments: Two risk algorithms, Qingdao Diabetes Prevention Program Risk Score (Gao, 2010) and New Chinese Diabetes Risk Score (Zhou, 2013) Outcome measures: Diagnostic accuracy as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and the sensitivity and specificity at the recommended optimal cutoff point. Results: Overall, 94 (20.2%) patients had undiagnosed diabetes. The AUC of the two above risk scores were 0.544 and 0.521 respectively, indicating the poor diagnostic accuracy for their use among our IFG patients to predict the presence of diabetes diagnosed by OGTT. At the optimal cutoff point, the sensitivity/specificity of risk scores for predicting undiagnosed DM was 91.5%/9.7% and 100%/3.0%, respectively. Conclusion: Although these two risk scores were derived from Chinese populations, they seemed more applicable to the general population rather than patients with IFG. A different algorithm should be developed to aid identification of those IFG patients with highest diabetic risk for further testing and to avoid unnecessary OGTT for the lower risk group.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherNorth American Primary Care Research Group.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group, NAPCRG 2014en_US
dc.titleClinical utility of ethnic-based diabetes risk scores for predicting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus among Chinese patients with impaired fasting glucose in primary care setting in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailYu, EYT: ytyu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailWong, CKH: carlosho@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityYu, EYT=rp01693en_US
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CKH=rp01931en_US
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros241737en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats