File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Anti-suit Injunctions and the Doctrine of Comity

TitleAnti-suit Injunctions and the Doctrine of Comity
Authors
Issue Date2016
PublisherJohn Wiley & Son. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/default.asp
Citation
The Modern Law Review, 2016, v. 79 n. 2, p. 341-354 How to Cite?
AbstractHin-Pro International Logistics Limited v CSAV is an important case in the areas of anti-suit injunctions, contractual interpretation and private international law. Despite the ambiguities surrounding the jurisdiction clause contained in the bills of lading, the Court of Appeal construed the jurisdiction clause as ‘exclusive’ in the context of a ‘contractual background’, and affirmed the continuation of the anti-suit injunction granted by the Commercial Court. It is argued that the approach of applying the common law principles of contractual interpretation to a bill of lading is questionable. The approach used to apply English private international law is problematic in a number of ways. There are legitimate reasons for concern that the doctrine of comity in English private international law may become undermined as a result.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/223912
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.540
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.370
SSRN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, FWH-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T02:32:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-18T02:32:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationThe Modern Law Review, 2016, v. 79 n. 2, p. 341-354-
dc.identifier.issn0026-7961-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/223912-
dc.description.abstractHin-Pro International Logistics Limited v CSAV is an important case in the areas of anti-suit injunctions, contractual interpretation and private international law. Despite the ambiguities surrounding the jurisdiction clause contained in the bills of lading, the Court of Appeal construed the jurisdiction clause as ‘exclusive’ in the context of a ‘contractual background’, and affirmed the continuation of the anti-suit injunction granted by the Commercial Court. It is argued that the approach of applying the common law principles of contractual interpretation to a bill of lading is questionable. The approach used to apply English private international law is problematic in a number of ways. There are legitimate reasons for concern that the doctrine of comity in English private international law may become undermined as a result.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Son. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/default.asp-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Modern Law Review-
dc.titleAnti-suit Injunctions and the Doctrine of Comity-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, FWH: fwhchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, FWH=rp01280-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-2230.12183-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84959374310-
dc.identifier.hkuros257246-
dc.identifier.volume79-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage341-
dc.identifier.epage354-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000371495400005-
dc.publisher.placeOxford, England-
dc.identifier.ssrn2740789-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2016/002-
dc.identifier.issnl0026-7961-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats