File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pseudo use value and output legitimacy of local growth coalitions in China: A case study of the Liede redevelopment project in Guangzhou

TitlePseudo use value and output legitimacy of local growth coalitions in China: A case study of the Liede redevelopment project in Guangzhou
Authors
KeywordsGuangzhou
Local growth coalition
Output legitimacy
Pseudo use value
Urban village
Issue Date2017
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cities
Citation
Cities, 2017, v. 61, p. 9-16 How to Cite?
AbstractExisting research on the growth coalition of China mainly focuses on the process of urban land development and concludes that the strategic alliance of local states and market gradually emerged with the exclusion of communities in the course of development. Empirical evidence on whether or not a coalition can involve the villagers and how a coalition capacity is delivered with legitimacy is lacking. This research revisits the growth machine thesis in the redevelopment of an urban village in Guangzhou where pseudo use value is examined. Pseudo use value reflects a hybrid of the appreciation of land, which incorporates the nostalgia for the rural past and the desire for improvement. Results show that complementary expectations in the redevelopment of urban village formed an ad hoc growth coalition that incorporates the municipal government, private developers, and villagers. The generation of output legitimacy is grounded on frequent exchange of resources (i.e., land, private capital, manpower, and regulatory capacities), which also relies on empowerment and an intermediary made of the rural collective to stimulate coalition capacity. Pseudo use value makes indigenous villagers a part of the growth machine. Although the formation of local growth coalition acknowledges the role of private developers and villagers, a counterpart emerged in which the development became a political rhetoric for achieving recentralized land governance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236431
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 6.077
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.771
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, RCK-
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y-
dc.contributor.authorLIN, J-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-25T00:53:18Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-25T00:53:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCities, 2017, v. 61, p. 9-16-
dc.identifier.issn0264-2751-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/236431-
dc.description.abstractExisting research on the growth coalition of China mainly focuses on the process of urban land development and concludes that the strategic alliance of local states and market gradually emerged with the exclusion of communities in the course of development. Empirical evidence on whether or not a coalition can involve the villagers and how a coalition capacity is delivered with legitimacy is lacking. This research revisits the growth machine thesis in the redevelopment of an urban village in Guangzhou where pseudo use value is examined. Pseudo use value reflects a hybrid of the appreciation of land, which incorporates the nostalgia for the rural past and the desire for improvement. Results show that complementary expectations in the redevelopment of urban village formed an ad hoc growth coalition that incorporates the municipal government, private developers, and villagers. The generation of output legitimacy is grounded on frequent exchange of resources (i.e., land, private capital, manpower, and regulatory capacities), which also relies on empowerment and an intermediary made of the rural collective to stimulate coalition capacity. Pseudo use value makes indigenous villagers a part of the growth machine. Although the formation of local growth coalition acknowledges the role of private developers and villagers, a counterpart emerged in which the development became a political rhetoric for achieving recentralized land governance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cities-
dc.relation.ispartofCities-
dc.rightsPosting accepted manuscript (postprint): © <year>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectGuangzhou-
dc.subjectLocal growth coalition-
dc.subjectOutput legitimacy-
dc.subjectPseudo use value-
dc.subjectUrban village-
dc.titlePseudo use value and output legitimacy of local growth coalitions in China: A case study of the Liede redevelopment project in Guangzhou-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, RCK: hrxucck@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, RCK=rp00992-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.018-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84995468820-
dc.identifier.hkuros270593-
dc.identifier.volume61-
dc.identifier.spage9-
dc.identifier.epage16-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000393001100002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0264-2751-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats