File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Intra-oral Comparison Of Peri-implant Mucositis And Gingivitis Microbiota

TitleIntra-oral Comparison Of Peri-implant Mucositis And Gingivitis Microbiota
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iadr.org/
Citation
The 31st Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research Southeast Asian Division (IADR-SEA), 28th Annual Scientific Meeting of South East Asia Association for Dental Education (SEAADE) & 40th Chinese Taipei Association for Dental Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, 10-13 August 2017. In Journal of Dental Research (Spec Issue), 2017, v. 96 n. Spec. Iss. B, abstract no. S0022 (SEA Division) How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To characterize and compare the supra-gingival/supra-mucosal and subgingival/sub-mucosal microbiota from diseased periodontal and peri-implant niches within individuals presenting with both gingivitis and peri-implant mucositis. Methods: 22 Chinese subjects were recruited with informed consent. Each subject carried at least one implant with peri-implant mucositis and one tooth with gingivitis. Supra-gingival/supra-mucosal and subgingival/sub-mucosal plaques were sampled from diseased implant/tooth sites in each subject. Samples (n=198) were characterized by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V3-V4) using the Illumina MiSeq PE300 system. Sequence data were analyzed using QIIME and other bioinformatics and statistical approaches. Results: A total of 3,911,219 quality-filtered reads were assigned to 2,418 operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 97% similarity cut-off). Bacteria from 11 phyla comprising 118 genera were identified. Approximately half of the OTUs (1,705) were detected in all four clinical sites. Diversity analyses based on the species richness estimates, observed OTUs and phylogenetic diversity revealed no statistically-significant differences between the microbiota present within the supra-gingival,supra-mucosal, subgingival and sub-mucosal niches. Further analyses of the relative abundances of individual species revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in 36 species from the supra-gingival/supra-mucosal niches; and 43 species from the subgingival/sub-mucosal niches between teeth and implants. Notably Veillonella dispar, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Corynebacterium durum, Selenomonas noxia and Capnocytophaga sp. HOT336 were all more abundant in teeth than in implants in both the supra- and sub-gingival/mucosal fractions; whilst Neisseria oralis, Granulicatella elegans, Aggregatibacter sp. HOT898 and Ottowia sp. HOT894 were significantly less abundant in teeth. Conclusions: The bacterial microbiota within gingivitis and peri-implant mucositis tooth/implant sites in the same individual share high levels of overall similarity. We speculate that differences in bacterial taxa present at diseased implant versus tooth niches primarily reflect differences in the host physiology and histology at the respective implant/tooth sites.
DescriptionOral Session 6 Microbiology/Immunology (1)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/245484

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, YK-
dc.contributor.authorYu, XL-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, WK-
dc.contributor.authorWatt, RM-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T02:11:31Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-18T02:11:31Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationThe 31st Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Association for Dental Research Southeast Asian Division (IADR-SEA), 28th Annual Scientific Meeting of South East Asia Association for Dental Education (SEAADE) & 40th Chinese Taipei Association for Dental Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, 10-13 August 2017. In Journal of Dental Research (Spec Issue), 2017, v. 96 n. Spec. Iss. B, abstract no. S0022 (SEA Division)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/245484-
dc.descriptionOral Session 6 Microbiology/Immunology (1)-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To characterize and compare the supra-gingival/supra-mucosal and subgingival/sub-mucosal microbiota from diseased periodontal and peri-implant niches within individuals presenting with both gingivitis and peri-implant mucositis. Methods: 22 Chinese subjects were recruited with informed consent. Each subject carried at least one implant with peri-implant mucositis and one tooth with gingivitis. Supra-gingival/supra-mucosal and subgingival/sub-mucosal plaques were sampled from diseased implant/tooth sites in each subject. Samples (n=198) were characterized by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (V3-V4) using the Illumina MiSeq PE300 system. Sequence data were analyzed using QIIME and other bioinformatics and statistical approaches. Results: A total of 3,911,219 quality-filtered reads were assigned to 2,418 operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 97% similarity cut-off). Bacteria from 11 phyla comprising 118 genera were identified. Approximately half of the OTUs (1,705) were detected in all four clinical sites. Diversity analyses based on the species richness estimates, observed OTUs and phylogenetic diversity revealed no statistically-significant differences between the microbiota present within the supra-gingival,supra-mucosal, subgingival and sub-mucosal niches. Further analyses of the relative abundances of individual species revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in 36 species from the supra-gingival/supra-mucosal niches; and 43 species from the subgingival/sub-mucosal niches between teeth and implants. Notably Veillonella dispar, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Corynebacterium durum, Selenomonas noxia and Capnocytophaga sp. HOT336 were all more abundant in teeth than in implants in both the supra- and sub-gingival/mucosal fractions; whilst Neisseria oralis, Granulicatella elegans, Aggregatibacter sp. HOT898 and Ottowia sp. HOT894 were significantly less abundant in teeth. Conclusions: The bacterial microbiota within gingivitis and peri-implant mucositis tooth/implant sites in the same individual share high levels of overall similarity. We speculate that differences in bacterial taxa present at diseased implant versus tooth niches primarily reflect differences in the host physiology and histology at the respective implant/tooth sites.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.iadr.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Research (Spec Issue)-
dc.titleIntra-oral Comparison Of Peri-implant Mucositis And Gingivitis Microbiota-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailChan, YK: yukicyk@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, WK: ewkleung@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWatt, RM: rmwatt@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, YK=rp02228-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, WK=rp00019-
dc.identifier.authorityWatt, RM=rp00043-
dc.identifier.hkuros278641-
dc.identifier.volume96-
dc.identifier.issueSpec. Iss. B-
dc.identifier.spageS0022 (SEA Division)-
dc.identifier.epageS0022 (SEA Division)-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats