File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Minimizing The Gender Difference In Perceived Safety: Comparing The Effects Of Urban Back Alley Interventions

TitleMinimizing The Gender Difference In Perceived Safety: Comparing The Effects Of Urban Back Alley Interventions
Authors
KeywordsBack alley
Environmental intervention
Gender difference
High-density city
Perceived safety
Issue Date2017
PublisherELSEVIER. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jep
Citation
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, v. 51, p. 117-131 How to Cite?
AbstractUrban alleys are perceived as unsafe, especially by women. We conducted a photograph-questionnaire survey to examine gender difference in perceived safety of alley scenes. Photograph simulation technology was used to create three categories of intervention scenes: Cleaning, Vegetation, and Urban Function & Vegetation. For the existing (Baseline) and Cleaning scenes, perceived safety remained low for both genders, though men's perceived safety was significantly higher than women's. Vegetation scenes were perceived as moderately safe for both genders, but men's ratings were still significantly higher. For Urban Function & Vegetation scenes, perceived safety was high for both genders, and the gender difference largely disappeared. Geometric vegetation yielded higher perceived safety than naturalistic vegetation for both genders. These findings provide clear evidence to support the efforts of policy makers, environmental designers, and community associations seeking to create safe and vital back alley environments for men and women in high-density cities across the world.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248362
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, B-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:42:00Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:42:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, v. 51, p. 117-131-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248362-
dc.description.abstractUrban alleys are perceived as unsafe, especially by women. We conducted a photograph-questionnaire survey to examine gender difference in perceived safety of alley scenes. Photograph simulation technology was used to create three categories of intervention scenes: Cleaning, Vegetation, and Urban Function & Vegetation. For the existing (Baseline) and Cleaning scenes, perceived safety remained low for both genders, though men's perceived safety was significantly higher than women's. Vegetation scenes were perceived as moderately safe for both genders, but men's ratings were still significantly higher. For Urban Function & Vegetation scenes, perceived safety was high for both genders, and the gender difference largely disappeared. Geometric vegetation yielded higher perceived safety than naturalistic vegetation for both genders. These findings provide clear evidence to support the efforts of policy makers, environmental designers, and community associations seeking to create safe and vital back alley environments for men and women in high-density cities across the world.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherELSEVIER. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jep-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Psychology-
dc.rightsPosting accepted manuscript (postprint): © <year>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectBack alley-
dc.subjectEnvironmental intervention-
dc.subjectGender difference-
dc.subjectHigh-density city-
dc.subjectPerceived safety-
dc.titleMinimizing The Gender Difference In Perceived Safety: Comparing The Effects Of Urban Back Alley Interventions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailJiang, B: jiangbin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityJiang, B=rp01942-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.012-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85016028933-
dc.identifier.hkuros281597-
dc.identifier.volume51-
dc.identifier.spage117-
dc.identifier.epage131-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000403029300010-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats