File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Socioeconomic burden of air pollution in China: Province-level analysis based on energy economic model

TitleSocioeconomic burden of air pollution in China: Province-level analysis based on energy economic model
Authors
KeywordsChina
Socioeconomic burden
Computable general equilibrium
Air pollution
Issue Date2017
Citation
Energy Economics, 2017, v. 68, p. 478-489 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2017 Elsevier B.V. In this study, we apply to China the China Regional Energy Model, developed as part of the Regional Emissions Air-Quality Climate Health (REACH) assessment framework, and estimate PM 2.5 -associated health costs. We estimate that, in 2015, exposure to PM 2.5 caused a nationwide welfare loss of US$248 billion (3.6% of the baseline welfare level). Over half the cost is from mortalities associated with chronic exposure, followed by broader economic loss (38%) and direct loss from short-term exposure (9%). The cost varies among provinces (0.5%–5.8% of the baseline welfare level), due to subnational heterogeneity in air quality, population density, and income levels. The cost in absolute terms is large in populous, coastal provinces, such as Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Guangdong, but when the local economy size is controlled for, the Greater Beijing area and central inland provinces also suffer large welfare losses in relative terms.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251873
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 9.252
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.500
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xu-
dc.contributor.authorOu, Xunmin-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorQi, Tianyu-
dc.contributor.authorNam, Kyung Min-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Da-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiliang-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T02:21:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-29T02:21:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Economics, 2017, v. 68, p. 478-489-
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251873-
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Elsevier B.V. In this study, we apply to China the China Regional Energy Model, developed as part of the Regional Emissions Air-Quality Climate Health (REACH) assessment framework, and estimate PM 2.5 -associated health costs. We estimate that, in 2015, exposure to PM 2.5 caused a nationwide welfare loss of US$248 billion (3.6% of the baseline welfare level). Over half the cost is from mortalities associated with chronic exposure, followed by broader economic loss (38%) and direct loss from short-term exposure (9%). The cost varies among provinces (0.5%–5.8% of the baseline welfare level), due to subnational heterogeneity in air quality, population density, and income levels. The cost in absolute terms is large in populous, coastal provinces, such as Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Guangdong, but when the local economy size is controlled for, the Greater Beijing area and central inland provinces also suffer large welfare losses in relative terms.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Economics-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic burden-
dc.subjectComputable general equilibrium-
dc.subjectAir pollution-
dc.titleSocioeconomic burden of air pollution in China: Province-level analysis based on energy economic model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.013-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85033554014-
dc.identifier.hkuros284122-
dc.identifier.volume68-
dc.identifier.spage478-
dc.identifier.epage489-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000418208100038-
dc.identifier.issnl0140-9883-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats