File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Child-Pugh Parameters and Platelet Count as an Alternative to ICG Test for Assessing Liver Function for Major Hepatectomy

TitleChild-Pugh Parameters and Platelet Count as an Alternative to ICG Test for Assessing Liver Function for Major Hepatectomy
Authors
Issue Date2017
Citation
HPB Surgery, 2017, v. 2017, article no. 2948030 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective. To study the correlations and discrepancies between Child-Pugh system and indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test in assessing liver function reserve and explore the possibility of combining two systems to gain an overall liver function assessment. Design. Retrospective analysis of 2832 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients graded as Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B with ICG clearance test being performed was conducted. Results. ICG retention rate at 15 minutes (ICG15) correlates with Child-Pugh score, however, with a large variance. Platelet count improves the correlation between Child-Pugh score and ICG15. ICG15 can be estimated using the following regression formula: estimated ICG15 (eICG15) = 45.1 + 0.435 × bilirubin - 0.917 × albumin + 0.491 × prothrombin time - 0.0283 × platelet (R2=0.455). Patients with eICG15 > 20.0% who underwent major hepatectomy had a tendency towards more posthepatectomy liver failure (4.1% versus 8.0%, p=0.09) and higher in-hospital mortality (3.7% versus 8.0%, p=0.052). They also had shorter median overall survival (5.10±0.553 versus 3.01±0.878 years, p=0.015) and disease-free survival (1.37±0.215 versus 0.707±0.183 years, p=0.018). Conclusion. eICG15 can be predicted from Child-Pugh parameters and platelet count. eICG15 correlates with in-hospital mortality after major hepatectomy and predicts long-term survival.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254464
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.561

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAu, KP-
dc.contributor.authorChan, SC-
dc.contributor.authorChok, KSH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, ACY-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, TT-
dc.contributor.authorNg, KKC-
dc.contributor.authorLo, CM-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T15:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-19T15:40:37Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationHPB Surgery, 2017, v. 2017, article no. 2948030-
dc.identifier.issn0894-8569-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254464-
dc.description.abstractObjective. To study the correlations and discrepancies between Child-Pugh system and indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test in assessing liver function reserve and explore the possibility of combining two systems to gain an overall liver function assessment. Design. Retrospective analysis of 2832 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients graded as Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B with ICG clearance test being performed was conducted. Results. ICG retention rate at 15 minutes (ICG15) correlates with Child-Pugh score, however, with a large variance. Platelet count improves the correlation between Child-Pugh score and ICG15. ICG15 can be estimated using the following regression formula: estimated ICG15 (eICG15) = 45.1 + 0.435 × bilirubin - 0.917 × albumin + 0.491 × prothrombin time - 0.0283 × platelet (R2=0.455). Patients with eICG15 > 20.0% who underwent major hepatectomy had a tendency towards more posthepatectomy liver failure (4.1% versus 8.0%, p=0.09) and higher in-hospital mortality (3.7% versus 8.0%, p=0.052). They also had shorter median overall survival (5.10±0.553 versus 3.01±0.878 years, p=0.015) and disease-free survival (1.37±0.215 versus 0.707±0.183 years, p=0.018). Conclusion. eICG15 can be predicted from Child-Pugh parameters and platelet count. eICG15 correlates with in-hospital mortality after major hepatectomy and predicts long-term survival.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHPB Surgery-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleChild-Pugh Parameters and Platelet Count as an Alternative to ICG Test for Assessing Liver Function for Major Hepatectomy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2017/2948030-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85029815360-
dc.identifier.hkuros288606-
dc.identifier.volume2017-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 2948030-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 2948030-
dc.identifier.eissn1607-8462-
dc.identifier.issnl0894-8569-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats