File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of 3D Scanning Versus 2D Photography for the Identification of Facial Soft-Tissue Landmarks

TitleComparison of 3D Scanning Versus 2D Photography for the Identification of Facial Soft-Tissue Landmarks
Authors
Keywords2D Photography
3D scanner
Face
Orthodontic and orthognathic treatments
Smile analysis
Soft-tissue analysis
Issue Date2018
PublisherBentham Open. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bentham.org/open/todentj/
Citation
The Open Dentistry Journal, 2018, v. 12, p. 61-71 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: Three dimensional facial scanning is an innovation that provides opportunity for digital data acquisition, smile analysis and communication of treatment plan and outcome with patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the applicability of 3D facial scanning as compared to 2D clinical photography. MATERIALS & METHODS: Sample consisted of thirty Caucasians aged between 25 and 50 years old, without any dentofacial deformities. Fifteen soft-tissue facial landmarks were identified twice by 3 observers on 2D and 3D images of the 30 subjects. Five linear proportions and nine angular measurements were established in the orbital, nasal and oral regions. These data were compared to anthropometric norms of young Caucasians. Furthermore, a questionnaire was completed by 14 other observers, according to their personal judgment of the 2D and 3D images. RESULTS: Quantitatively, proportions linking the three facial regions in 3D were closer to the clinical standard (for 2D 3.3% and for 3D 1.8% error rate). Qualitatively, in 67% of the cases, observers were as confident about 3D as they were about 2D. Intra-observer Correlation Coefficient (ICC) revealed a better agreement between observers in 3D for the questions related to facial form, lip step and chin posture. CONCLUSION: The laser facial scanning could be a useful and reliable tool to analyze the circumoral region for orthodontic and orthognathic treatments as well as for plastic surgery planning and outcome.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254868
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.428
PubMed Central ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZogheib, T-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, R-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, MM-
dc.contributor.authorAgbaje, JO-
dc.contributor.authorAnumendem, D-
dc.contributor.authorKlazen, Y-
dc.contributor.authorPolitis, C-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-21T01:07:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-21T01:07:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe Open Dentistry Journal, 2018, v. 12, p. 61-71-
dc.identifier.issn1874-2106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/254868-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Three dimensional facial scanning is an innovation that provides opportunity for digital data acquisition, smile analysis and communication of treatment plan and outcome with patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the applicability of 3D facial scanning as compared to 2D clinical photography. MATERIALS & METHODS: Sample consisted of thirty Caucasians aged between 25 and 50 years old, without any dentofacial deformities. Fifteen soft-tissue facial landmarks were identified twice by 3 observers on 2D and 3D images of the 30 subjects. Five linear proportions and nine angular measurements were established in the orbital, nasal and oral regions. These data were compared to anthropometric norms of young Caucasians. Furthermore, a questionnaire was completed by 14 other observers, according to their personal judgment of the 2D and 3D images. RESULTS: Quantitatively, proportions linking the three facial regions in 3D were closer to the clinical standard (for 2D 3.3% and for 3D 1.8% error rate). Qualitatively, in 67% of the cases, observers were as confident about 3D as they were about 2D. Intra-observer Correlation Coefficient (ICC) revealed a better agreement between observers in 3D for the questions related to facial form, lip step and chin posture. CONCLUSION: The laser facial scanning could be a useful and reliable tool to analyze the circumoral region for orthodontic and orthognathic treatments as well as for plastic surgery planning and outcome.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBentham Open. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bentham.org/open/todentj/-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Open Dentistry Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject2D Photography-
dc.subject3D scanner-
dc.subjectFace-
dc.subjectOrthodontic and orthognathic treatments-
dc.subjectSmile analysis-
dc.subjectSoft-tissue analysis-
dc.titleComparison of 3D Scanning Versus 2D Photography for the Identification of Facial Soft-Tissue Landmarks-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBornstein, MM: bornst@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBornstein, MM=rp02217-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874210601812010061-
dc.identifier.pmid29492171-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5814946-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85043527316-
dc.identifier.hkuros285427-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.spage61-
dc.identifier.epage71-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl1874-2106-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats