File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials

TitleChallenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
Authors
KeywordsTarget volume delineation variability
Contouring guidelines
Peer review
Education program
Clinical trial
Issue Date2017
PublisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/oncology
Citation
Frontiers in Oncology, 2017, v. 7, article no. 221, p. 1-8 How to Cite?
AbstractIn recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256558
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.738
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.834
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, ATY-
dc.contributor.authorTan, LT-
dc.contributor.authorDuke, S-
dc.contributor.authorNg, WT-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T06:36:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T06:36:30Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Oncology, 2017, v. 7, article no. 221, p. 1-8-
dc.identifier.issn2234-943X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/256558-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/oncology-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Oncology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectTarget volume delineation variability-
dc.subjectContouring guidelines-
dc.subjectPeer review-
dc.subjectEducation program-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.titleChallenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChang, ATY: atychang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, WT: ngwt1@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, ATY=rp02251-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, WT=rp02671-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fonc.2017.00221-
dc.identifier.pmid28993798-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5622143-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85029796556-
dc.identifier.hkuros286308-
dc.identifier.volume7-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 221, p. 1-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 221, p. 8-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000411526200001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-
dc.identifier.issnl2234-943X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats