File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparative pyrolysis upcycling of polystyrene waste: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and product evolution profile

TitleComparative pyrolysis upcycling of polystyrene waste: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and product evolution profile
Authors
KeywordsPolystyrene waste
Pyrolysis
TG-FTIR
Thermodynamics
Kinetics
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2013, v. 111, n. 1, p. 781-788 How to Cite?
AbstractPyrolysis is one important way to treat polystyrene waste and upcycle it into useful materials. A comparative pyrolysis study of virgin polystyrene (VPS) and two types of commonly used polystyrene products, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and polystyrene container (CPS) was carried out. Various values were found in the thermodynamic study and kinetic study of VPS, EPS, and CPS pyrolysis, suggesting distinct thermal degradation characteristics of these materials. The energy barrier order of the pyrolysis processes was EPS, CPS, VPS, showing activation energy of 230, 219, and 145 kJ mol-1, respectively. The order of amount of heat absorbed was EPS, CPS, VPS, with enthalpy of 224, 213, and 139 kJ mol-1, respectively. The reaction favorability order was EPS, CPS, and VPS with Gibbs free energy of 118, 132, and 210 kJ mol -1, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated the use of high heating rate would increase the reaction rate and shorten the reaction time. Product evolution profiles showed that VPS and CPS pyrolysis produced mainly aromatics, while EPS pyrolysis produced aromatics at the initial phase of the reaction and aliphatic hydrocarbon at the latter phase. The diverse pyrolysis behaviors of VPS, EPS, and CPS demonstrated that an examination on different polystyrene materials was desired to optimize the pyrolysis conditions and product distribution, and thus benefit the process of valuable materials recovery. © 2012 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/270342
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.755
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.521
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMo, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Lei-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chia Lung-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Giin Yu Amy-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jing Yuan-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-27T03:57:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-27T03:57:20Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2013, v. 111, n. 1, p. 781-788-
dc.identifier.issn1388-6150-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/270342-
dc.description.abstractPyrolysis is one important way to treat polystyrene waste and upcycle it into useful materials. A comparative pyrolysis study of virgin polystyrene (VPS) and two types of commonly used polystyrene products, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and polystyrene container (CPS) was carried out. Various values were found in the thermodynamic study and kinetic study of VPS, EPS, and CPS pyrolysis, suggesting distinct thermal degradation characteristics of these materials. The energy barrier order of the pyrolysis processes was EPS, CPS, VPS, showing activation energy of 230, 219, and 145 kJ mol-1, respectively. The order of amount of heat absorbed was EPS, CPS, VPS, with enthalpy of 224, 213, and 139 kJ mol-1, respectively. The reaction favorability order was EPS, CPS, and VPS with Gibbs free energy of 118, 132, and 210 kJ mol -1, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated the use of high heating rate would increase the reaction rate and shorten the reaction time. Product evolution profiles showed that VPS and CPS pyrolysis produced mainly aromatics, while EPS pyrolysis produced aromatics at the initial phase of the reaction and aliphatic hydrocarbon at the latter phase. The diverse pyrolysis behaviors of VPS, EPS, and CPS demonstrated that an examination on different polystyrene materials was desired to optimize the pyrolysis conditions and product distribution, and thus benefit the process of valuable materials recovery. © 2012 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry-
dc.subjectPolystyrene waste-
dc.subjectPyrolysis-
dc.subjectTG-FTIR-
dc.subjectThermodynamics-
dc.subjectKinetics-
dc.titleComparative pyrolysis upcycling of polystyrene waste: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and product evolution profile-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10973-012-2464-6-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84872497273-
dc.identifier.volume111-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage781-
dc.identifier.epage788-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000313207400100-
dc.identifier.issnl1388-6150-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats