File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Remediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training

TitleRemediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training
Authors
Keywordsautobiographical memory
bipolar disorder
Memory Specificity Training
reduced autobiographical memory specificity
Issue Date2019
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2157-9032
Citation
Brain and Behavior, 2019, v. 9 n. 12, p. article no. e01468 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Reduced autobiographical memory specificity (rAMS) is a vulnerability factor found across unipolar depression (UD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (BD). A group delivered psychological therapy training called Memory Specificity Training (MeST) remediates rAMS in UD and PTSD, with additional downstream effects on related psychological processes and symptoms. Its impact in BD is unknown. In this case study, we examined the impact of a computerized version of MeST (c‐MeST) on improving AMS and related symptoms and processes in participant with rapid cycling type I BD. Method: An experimental case study with an ABA design was used. During baseline (14 days, Phase A), the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days, Phase B), and a 1‐month follow‐up (Phase A), memory specificity, depressive symptoms, and related processes and symptoms were repeatedly measured. Results: Memory specificity increased significantly after the participant completed c‐MeST. Session‐to‐session scores indicated that AMS improved most from the in‐person baseline assessment to the first online session. All other measures of processes and symptoms deteriorated during the training phase but regressed to baseline during follow‐up. Conclusion: Memory specificity was improved as indicated by increased AMS from pre‐intervention measurement to 1‐month follow‐up. Other improvements in symptoms were not observed. Rather, some related maladaptive psychological processes and symptoms worsened during the training phase and regressed to baseline during follow‐up.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280257
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.405
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.915
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartens, K-
dc.contributor.authorTakano, K-
dc.contributor.authorBarry, TJ-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, EA-
dc.contributor.authorWyckaert, S-
dc.contributor.authorRaes, F-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T11:50:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-21T11:50:51Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationBrain and Behavior, 2019, v. 9 n. 12, p. article no. e01468-
dc.identifier.issn2162-3279-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/280257-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Reduced autobiographical memory specificity (rAMS) is a vulnerability factor found across unipolar depression (UD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (BD). A group delivered psychological therapy training called Memory Specificity Training (MeST) remediates rAMS in UD and PTSD, with additional downstream effects on related psychological processes and symptoms. Its impact in BD is unknown. In this case study, we examined the impact of a computerized version of MeST (c‐MeST) on improving AMS and related symptoms and processes in participant with rapid cycling type I BD. Method: An experimental case study with an ABA design was used. During baseline (14 days, Phase A), the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days, Phase B), and a 1‐month follow‐up (Phase A), memory specificity, depressive symptoms, and related processes and symptoms were repeatedly measured. Results: Memory specificity increased significantly after the participant completed c‐MeST. Session‐to‐session scores indicated that AMS improved most from the in‐person baseline assessment to the first online session. All other measures of processes and symptoms deteriorated during the training phase but regressed to baseline during follow‐up. Conclusion: Memory specificity was improved as indicated by increased AMS from pre‐intervention measurement to 1‐month follow‐up. Other improvements in symptoms were not observed. Rather, some related maladaptive psychological processes and symptoms worsened during the training phase and regressed to baseline during follow‐up.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2157-9032-
dc.relation.ispartofBrain and Behavior-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectautobiographical memory-
dc.subjectbipolar disorder-
dc.subjectMemory Specificity Training-
dc.subjectreduced autobiographical memory specificity-
dc.titleRemediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBarry, TJ: tjbarry@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBarry, TJ=rp02277-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/brb3.1468-
dc.identifier.pmid31747124-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6908894-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85075250767-
dc.identifier.hkuros309009-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue12-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e01468-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e01468-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000497237300001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2162-3279-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats