File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Interpretation biases and visual attention in the processing of ambiguous information in chronic pain

TitleInterpretation biases and visual attention in the processing of ambiguous information in chronic pain
Authors
Keywordsadult
attentional bias
chronic disease
chronic pain
clinical article
Issue Date2020
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2149
Citation
European Journal of Pain, 2020, v. 24 n. 7, p. 1242-1256 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Theories propose that interpretation biases and attentional biases might account for the maintenance of chronic pain symptoms, but the interactions between these two forms of biases in the context of chronic pain are understudied. Methods: To fill this gap, 63 participants (40 females) with and without chronic pain completed an interpretation bias task that measures participants’ interpretation styles in ambiguous scenarios and a novel eye‐tracking task where participants freely viewed neutral faces that were given ambiguous pain/health‐related labels (i.e. ‘doctor’, ‘patient’ and ‘healthy people’). Eye movements were analysed with the Hidden Markov Models (EMHMM) approach, a machine‐learning data‐driven method that clusters people's eye movements into different strategy subgroups. Results: Adults with chronic pain endorsed more negative interpretations for scenarios related to immediate bodily injury and long‐term illness than healthy controls, but they did not differ significantly in terms of their eye movements on ambiguous faces. Across groups, people who interpreted illness‐related scenarios in a more negative way also focused more on the nose region and less on the eye region when looking at patients’ and healthy people's faces and, to a lesser extent, doctors’ faces. This association between interpretive and attentional processing was particularly apparent in participants with chronic pain. Conclusions: In summary, the present study provided evidence for the interplay between multiple forms of cognitive biases. Future studies should investigate whether this interaction might influence subsequent functioning in people with chronic pain.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284918
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.651
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.305
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCHAN, FHF-
dc.contributor.authorSuen, H-
dc.contributor.authorHsiao, JH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, AB-
dc.contributor.authorBarry, TJ-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T09:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-07T09:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Pain, 2020, v. 24 n. 7, p. 1242-1256-
dc.identifier.issn1090-3801-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/284918-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Theories propose that interpretation biases and attentional biases might account for the maintenance of chronic pain symptoms, but the interactions between these two forms of biases in the context of chronic pain are understudied. Methods: To fill this gap, 63 participants (40 females) with and without chronic pain completed an interpretation bias task that measures participants’ interpretation styles in ambiguous scenarios and a novel eye‐tracking task where participants freely viewed neutral faces that were given ambiguous pain/health‐related labels (i.e. ‘doctor’, ‘patient’ and ‘healthy people’). Eye movements were analysed with the Hidden Markov Models (EMHMM) approach, a machine‐learning data‐driven method that clusters people's eye movements into different strategy subgroups. Results: Adults with chronic pain endorsed more negative interpretations for scenarios related to immediate bodily injury and long‐term illness than healthy controls, but they did not differ significantly in terms of their eye movements on ambiguous faces. Across groups, people who interpreted illness‐related scenarios in a more negative way also focused more on the nose region and less on the eye region when looking at patients’ and healthy people's faces and, to a lesser extent, doctors’ faces. This association between interpretive and attentional processing was particularly apparent in participants with chronic pain. Conclusions: In summary, the present study provided evidence for the interplay between multiple forms of cognitive biases. Future studies should investigate whether this interaction might influence subsequent functioning in people with chronic pain.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2149-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Pain-
dc.rightsPreprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectadult-
dc.subjectattentional bias-
dc.subjectchronic disease-
dc.subjectchronic pain-
dc.subjectclinical article-
dc.titleInterpretation biases and visual attention in the processing of ambiguous information in chronic pain-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHsiao, JH: jhsiao@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailBarry, TJ: tjbarry@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHsiao, JH=rp00632-
dc.identifier.authorityBarry, TJ=rp02277-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ejp.1565-
dc.identifier.pmid32223046-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85083294863-
dc.identifier.hkuros312563-
dc.identifier.volume24-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1242-
dc.identifier.epage1256-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000525839200001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1090-3801-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats