File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hong Kong academics’ perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy

TitleHong Kong academics’ perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy
Authors
KeywordsAcademic self-efficacy
Hong Kong academics
Job dissatisfaction
Perceived work environment
Issue Date2020
PublisherWiley for British Psychological Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279
Citation
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, v. 112 n. 7, p. 1431-1443 How to Cite?
AbstractMuch research has been conducted to investigate the impact of work environment on academics' job satisfaction. However, little is known about what contributes to academics' job dissatisfaction. Job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are two distinct entities because a lack of job satisfaction cannot be simply equated with job dissatisfaction. This research investigated the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction. Participants were 547 academics from the 8 University Grants Committee-funded higher educational institutions in Hong Kong. Results show that academics' perceptions of their work environment (including their perceptions of institutional expectations regarding research, university governance and management, and working conditions) statistically predicted job dissatisfaction both directly and indirectly through academic self-efficacy in research and teaching, irrespective of age, gender, academic rank, institutional ranking, and primary academic discipline. The findings enrich the literature concerning perceived work environment, academic self-efficacy, and job dissatisfaction. At the same time, they establish a meaningful link among the fields of psychology, higher education, and career development and have practical implications for academics and university senior managers and, most likely, for senior leaders in other occupations. © 2020 American Psychological Association.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287597
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.744
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.557
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, LF-
dc.contributor.authorFu, M-
dc.contributor.authorLI, DT-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:00:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:00:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2020, v. 112 n. 7, p. 1431-1443-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0998-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287597-
dc.description.abstractMuch research has been conducted to investigate the impact of work environment on academics' job satisfaction. However, little is known about what contributes to academics' job dissatisfaction. Job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are two distinct entities because a lack of job satisfaction cannot be simply equated with job dissatisfaction. This research investigated the mediating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction. Participants were 547 academics from the 8 University Grants Committee-funded higher educational institutions in Hong Kong. Results show that academics' perceptions of their work environment (including their perceptions of institutional expectations regarding research, university governance and management, and working conditions) statistically predicted job dissatisfaction both directly and indirectly through academic self-efficacy in research and teaching, irrespective of age, gender, academic rank, institutional ranking, and primary academic discipline. The findings enrich the literature concerning perceived work environment, academic self-efficacy, and job dissatisfaction. At the same time, they establish a meaningful link among the fields of psychology, higher education, and career development and have practical implications for academics and university senior managers and, most likely, for senior leaders in other occupations. © 2020 American Psychological Association.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley for British Psychological Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2044-8279-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Educational Psychology-
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectAcademic self-efficacy-
dc.subjectHong Kong academics-
dc.subjectJob dissatisfaction-
dc.subjectPerceived work environment-
dc.titleHong Kong academics’ perceived work environment and job dissatisfaction: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, LF: lfzhang@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, LF=rp00988-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/edu0000437-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85076363726-
dc.identifier.hkuros315511-
dc.identifier.volume112-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spage1431-
dc.identifier.epage1443-
dc.identifier.eissn1939-2176-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000576766800008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats