File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Article: The Courts, Public Opinion and the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons: A Hong Kong Perspective

TitleThe Courts, Public Opinion and the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons: A Hong Kong Perspective
Authors
Issue Date2019
Citation
Australian Journal of Asian Law, 2019, v. 20 No. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractIn recent years, courts in many jurisdictions have considered the relevance of societal consensus when judicially reviewing policies that affect the rights of sexual orientation and gender identity minorities. This article focuses on three landmark cases concerning transgender marriage and the rights of same-sex couples in Hong Kong, where the apex court has produced relatively progressive rights jurisprudence. A study of these decisions offers comparative insights about the role of public opinion when judges resolve potentially controversial claims involving the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. It examines the lower courts’ reliance on, and the Court of Final Appeal’s ultimate rejection of, consensus as a factor when justifying limitations on fundamental rights. At the same time, this analysis suggests that a more nuanced approach — entailing both resistance and responsiveness to public opinion — may be warranted. The Hong Kong jurisprudence sets the stage for developing alternative understandings of consensus which could enhance judicial contributions toward broader discussions in support of LGBT rights protection.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290586

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoper, KA-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-02T05:44:20Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-02T05:44:20Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Journal of Asian Law, 2019, v. 20 No. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/290586-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, courts in many jurisdictions have considered the relevance of societal consensus when judicially reviewing policies that affect the rights of sexual orientation and gender identity minorities. This article focuses on three landmark cases concerning transgender marriage and the rights of same-sex couples in Hong Kong, where the apex court has produced relatively progressive rights jurisprudence. A study of these decisions offers comparative insights about the role of public opinion when judges resolve potentially controversial claims involving the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) persons. It examines the lower courts’ reliance on, and the Court of Final Appeal’s ultimate rejection of, consensus as a factor when justifying limitations on fundamental rights. At the same time, this analysis suggests that a more nuanced approach — entailing both resistance and responsiveness to public opinion — may be warranted. The Hong Kong jurisprudence sets the stage for developing alternative understandings of consensus which could enhance judicial contributions toward broader discussions in support of LGBT rights protection.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Asian Law-
dc.titleThe Courts, Public Opinion and the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons: A Hong Kong Perspective-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLoper, KA: kloper@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLoper, KA=rp01267-
dc.identifier.hkuros318245-
dc.identifier.volume20 No. 1-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats