File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Machine learning-based models to support decision-making in emergency department triage for patients with suspected cardiovascular disease

TitleMachine learning-based models to support decision-making in emergency department triage for patients with suspected cardiovascular disease
Authors
KeywordsTriage
Emergency department
Decision-making
Machine learning
Cardiovascular disease
High-risk
Issue Date2021
PublisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijmedinf
Citation
International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2021, v. 145, article no. 104326 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Accurate differentiation and prioritization in emergency department (ED) triage is important to identify high-risk patients and to efficiently allocate of finite resources. Using data available from patients with suspected cardiovascular disease presenting at ED triage, this study aimed to train and compare the performance of four common machine learning models to assist in decision making of triage levels. Methods: This cross-sectional study in the second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University was conducted from August 2015 to December 2018 inclusive. Demographic information, vital signs, blood glucose, and other available triage scores were collected. Four machine learning models – multinomial logistic regression (multinomial LR), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF) and gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT) – were compared. For each model, 80 % of the data set was used for training and 20 % was used to test the models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and macro- were calculated for each model. Results: In 17,661 patients presenting with suspected cardiovascular disease, the distribution of triage of level 1, level 2, level 3 and level 4 were 1.3 %, 18.6 %, 76.5 %, and 3.6 % respectively. The AUCs were: XGBoost (0.937), GBDT (0.921), RF (0.919) and multinomial LR (0.908). Based on feature importance generated by XGBoost, blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and age were the most significant variables for making decisions at triage. Conclusion: Four machine learning models had good discriminative ability of triage. XGBoost demonstrated a slight advantage over other models. These models could be used for differential triage of low-risk patients and high-risk patients as a strategy to improve efficiency and allocation of finite resources.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294367
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.730
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.124
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiang, H-
dc.contributor.authorMao, H-
dc.contributor.authorLu, H-
dc.contributor.authorLin, P-
dc.contributor.authorGarry, W-
dc.contributor.authorLu, H-
dc.contributor.authorYang, G-
dc.contributor.authorRainer, TH-
dc.contributor.authorChen, X-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T08:22:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-01T08:22:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2021, v. 145, article no. 104326-
dc.identifier.issn1386-5056-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294367-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Accurate differentiation and prioritization in emergency department (ED) triage is important to identify high-risk patients and to efficiently allocate of finite resources. Using data available from patients with suspected cardiovascular disease presenting at ED triage, this study aimed to train and compare the performance of four common machine learning models to assist in decision making of triage levels. Methods: This cross-sectional study in the second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University was conducted from August 2015 to December 2018 inclusive. Demographic information, vital signs, blood glucose, and other available triage scores were collected. Four machine learning models – multinomial logistic regression (multinomial LR), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF) and gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT) – were compared. For each model, 80 % of the data set was used for training and 20 % was used to test the models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and macro- were calculated for each model. Results: In 17,661 patients presenting with suspected cardiovascular disease, the distribution of triage of level 1, level 2, level 3 and level 4 were 1.3 %, 18.6 %, 76.5 %, and 3.6 % respectively. The AUCs were: XGBoost (0.937), GBDT (0.921), RF (0.919) and multinomial LR (0.908). Based on feature importance generated by XGBoost, blood pressure, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, and age were the most significant variables for making decisions at triage. Conclusion: Four machine learning models had good discriminative ability of triage. XGBoost demonstrated a slight advantage over other models. These models could be used for differential triage of low-risk patients and high-risk patients as a strategy to improve efficiency and allocation of finite resources.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijmedinf-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Medical Informatics-
dc.subjectTriage-
dc.subjectEmergency department-
dc.subjectDecision-making-
dc.subjectMachine learning-
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease-
dc.subjectHigh-risk-
dc.titleMachine learning-based models to support decision-making in emergency department triage for patients with suspected cardiovascular disease-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailRainer, TH: thrainer@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityRainer, TH=rp02754-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104326-
dc.identifier.pmid33197878-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85096032044-
dc.identifier.hkuros700003903-
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104326-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104326-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000600414000007-
dc.publisher.placeIreland-
dc.identifier.issnl1386-5056-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats