File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Article: 物權的性質、取得與保護:普通法與大陸法的比較

Title物權的性質、取得與保護:普通法與大陸法的比較
Authors
Issue Date2020
Publisher中國建築工業出版社.
Citation
房地產研究, 2020, v. 1, p. 132-142 How to Cite?
Real Estate Research, 2020, v. 1, p. 132-142 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose of research: comparing the nature, acquisition and protection of property rights under Hong Kong common law and mainland property law in order to evaluate whether the latter is in line with the Anglo-American international standards. Research methodology: using comparative approach to compare Hong Kong and mainland property law and to engage in doctrinal analysis. Research outcome: Hong Kong and mainland property laws are conceptually quite similar in terms of the nature, acquisition and protection of property rights, eg they both allow individuals to own a bundle of rights over the land including the right to use, but not the ownership of the physical land. However, there are many important differences, eg right of use in the mainland is limited to a period of time, whereas in the Anglo-American system, there is fee simple; in mainland, property rights do not cover things that have no physical existence; owners of rights are specific, not relative; land does not include fixture; there is only legal but not equitable ownership; before buyer registers his property rights, he only has a claim against the seller in debt, and cannot obtain an order of specific performance; cannot obtain ownership through equitable principles; oral contracts only result in a claim in debt etc. Research conclusion: mainland property law is more concerned about formality and formal justice in order to achieve efficiency. When the law is not adequate, it will result in rigidity and unfairness, and may lack substantive justice and conscience as is achieved under equitable principles. If they can introduce some equitable principles where appropriate, it will enable the mainland property law to be closer to human nature, to be more about substantive justice and closer to international standards.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294706

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoo, SH-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-08T07:40:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-08T07:40:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citation房地產研究, 2020, v. 1, p. 132-142-
dc.identifier.citationReal Estate Research, 2020, v. 1, p. 132-142-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294706-
dc.description.abstractPurpose of research: comparing the nature, acquisition and protection of property rights under Hong Kong common law and mainland property law in order to evaluate whether the latter is in line with the Anglo-American international standards. Research methodology: using comparative approach to compare Hong Kong and mainland property law and to engage in doctrinal analysis. Research outcome: Hong Kong and mainland property laws are conceptually quite similar in terms of the nature, acquisition and protection of property rights, eg they both allow individuals to own a bundle of rights over the land including the right to use, but not the ownership of the physical land. However, there are many important differences, eg right of use in the mainland is limited to a period of time, whereas in the Anglo-American system, there is fee simple; in mainland, property rights do not cover things that have no physical existence; owners of rights are specific, not relative; land does not include fixture; there is only legal but not equitable ownership; before buyer registers his property rights, he only has a claim against the seller in debt, and cannot obtain an order of specific performance; cannot obtain ownership through equitable principles; oral contracts only result in a claim in debt etc. Research conclusion: mainland property law is more concerned about formality and formal justice in order to achieve efficiency. When the law is not adequate, it will result in rigidity and unfairness, and may lack substantive justice and conscience as is achieved under equitable principles. If they can introduce some equitable principles where appropriate, it will enable the mainland property law to be closer to human nature, to be more about substantive justice and closer to international standards.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher中國建築工業出版社. -
dc.relation.ispartof房地產研究-
dc.relation.ispartofReal Estate Research-
dc.title物權的性質、取得與保護:普通法與大陸法的比較-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGoo, SH: shgoo@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGoo, SH=rp01248-
dc.identifier.hkuros320367-
dc.identifier.volume1-
dc.identifier.spage132-
dc.identifier.epage142-
dc.publisher.placeBeijing-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats