File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Prospective study on the effects of orthotic treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis in chinese patients: Clinical outcome and gait analysis

TitleProspective study on the effects of orthotic treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis in chinese patients: Clinical outcome and gait analysis
矯形治療對於內側膝退化性關節炎華籍患者的效果:臨床結果和步態分析的前瞻性研究
Authors
Issue Date2015
Citation
Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 98-106 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various orthotic treatments for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Design: Prospective cohort study with sequential interventions. Setting: University-affiliated hospital, Hong Kong. Patients: From December 2010 to November 2011, 10 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were referred by orthopaedic surgeons for orthotic treatment. All patients were sequentially treated with flat insole, lateral-wedged insole, lateralwedged insole with subtalar strap, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, valgus knee brace, and valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support for 4 weeks with no treatment break. Three-dimensional gait analysis and questionnaires were completed after each orthotic treatment. Main outcome measures: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale scores, and peak and mean knee adduction moments. Results: Compared with pretreatment, the lateralwedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, and valgus knee brace groups demonstrated significant reductions in WOMAC pain score (19.1%, P=0.04; 18.2%, P=0.04; and 20.4%, P=0.02, respectively). The lateral-wedged insole with arch support group showed the greatest reduction in visual analogue scale score compared with pretreatment at 24.1% (P=0.004). Addition of a subtalar strap to lateral-wedged insoles (lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap) did not produce significant benefit when compared with the lateral-wedged insole alone. The valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support group demonstrated an additive effect with a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC total score (-26.7%, P=0.01). Compliance with treatment for the isolated insole groups were all over 90%, but compliance for the valgus knee brace–associated groups was only around 50%. Gait analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in peak and mean knee adduction moments in all orthotic groups when compared with a flat insole. Conclusions: These results support the use of orthotic treatment for early medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.
目的:評估各種矯形治療對於內側膝單室退化性關節炎患者的效果。 設計:連續性干預的前瞻性隊列研究。 安排:香港一所大學附屬醫院。 患者:從2010年12月到2011年11月,由骨科醫生轉介須進行矯正治療的內側膝退化性關節炎共有10例。所有患者均連續四週逐一接受以下治療:平鞋墊、外側楔型鞋墊、以綁帶將外側楔型鞋墊綁在腳底下、外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊、護膝,以及外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊並加上護膝。每次治療後均進行三維步態分析,並讓患者填寫問卷。 主要結果測量:西安大略和麥克馬斯特大學關節炎指數(WOMAC)、視覺模擬量表評分,以及峰值和平均膝蓋內收力矩。 結果:與治療前相比,外側楔型鞋墊、外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊和護膝治療的WOMAC疼痛子量指數顯著減少(其比率和P值依次為:19.1%,P=0.04;18.2%,P=0.04;20.4%,P=0.02)。與治療前相比,外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊治療的視覺模擬量表得分改善幅度最大(24.1%;P=0.004)。至於以綁帶將外側楔型鞋墊綁在腳底下的治療,與單獨使用外側楔型鞋墊相比,並沒有明顯改善。外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊並加上護膝的治療得到累加效應,其WOMAC總指數顯著下降(-26.7%,P=0.01)。所有使用外側楔型鞋墊的病人依從性均超過九成,可惜搭配護膝治療的依從性只有五成左右。步態分析顯示與平鞋墊比較,所有治療的峰值和平均膝蓋內收力矩均顯著下降。 結論:以上結果支持應在早期使用矯形治療醫治內側膝退化性關節炎。
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309218
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.256
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.357
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, HCH-
dc.contributor.authorLie, CWH-
dc.contributor.authorNg, TP-
dc.contributor.authorChen, KW-
dc.contributor.authorTse, CY-
dc.contributor.authorWong, WH-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T03:59:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-15T03:59:46Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Medical Journal, 2015, v. 21, n. 2, p. 98-106-
dc.identifier.issn1024-2708-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309218-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various orthotic treatments for patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Design: Prospective cohort study with sequential interventions. Setting: University-affiliated hospital, Hong Kong. Patients: From December 2010 to November 2011, 10 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were referred by orthopaedic surgeons for orthotic treatment. All patients were sequentially treated with flat insole, lateral-wedged insole, lateralwedged insole with subtalar strap, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, valgus knee brace, and valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support for 4 weeks with no treatment break. Three-dimensional gait analysis and questionnaires were completed after each orthotic treatment. Main outcome measures: The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analogue scale scores, and peak and mean knee adduction moments. Results: Compared with pretreatment, the lateralwedged insole, lateral-wedged insole with arch support, and valgus knee brace groups demonstrated significant reductions in WOMAC pain score (19.1%, P=0.04; 18.2%, P=0.04; and 20.4%, P=0.02, respectively). The lateral-wedged insole with arch support group showed the greatest reduction in visual analogue scale score compared with pretreatment at 24.1% (P=0.004). Addition of a subtalar strap to lateral-wedged insoles (lateral-wedged insole with subtalar strap) did not produce significant benefit when compared with the lateral-wedged insole alone. The valgus knee brace with lateral-wedged insole with arch support group demonstrated an additive effect with a statistically significant reduction in WOMAC total score (-26.7%, P=0.01). Compliance with treatment for the isolated insole groups were all over 90%, but compliance for the valgus knee brace–associated groups was only around 50%. Gait analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in peak and mean knee adduction moments in all orthotic groups when compared with a flat insole. Conclusions: These results support the use of orthotic treatment for early medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.-
dc.description.abstract目的:評估各種矯形治療對於內側膝單室退化性關節炎患者的效果。 設計:連續性干預的前瞻性隊列研究。 安排:香港一所大學附屬醫院。 患者:從2010年12月到2011年11月,由骨科醫生轉介須進行矯正治療的內側膝退化性關節炎共有10例。所有患者均連續四週逐一接受以下治療:平鞋墊、外側楔型鞋墊、以綁帶將外側楔型鞋墊綁在腳底下、外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊、護膝,以及外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊並加上護膝。每次治療後均進行三維步態分析,並讓患者填寫問卷。 主要結果測量:西安大略和麥克馬斯特大學關節炎指數(WOMAC)、視覺模擬量表評分,以及峰值和平均膝蓋內收力矩。 結果:與治療前相比,外側楔型鞋墊、外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊和護膝治療的WOMAC疼痛子量指數顯著減少(其比率和P值依次為:19.1%,P=0.04;18.2%,P=0.04;20.4%,P=0.02)。與治療前相比,外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊治療的視覺模擬量表得分改善幅度最大(24.1%;P=0.004)。至於以綁帶將外側楔型鞋墊綁在腳底下的治療,與單獨使用外側楔型鞋墊相比,並沒有明顯改善。外側楔型鞋墊搭配足弓墊並加上護膝的治療得到累加效應,其WOMAC總指數顯著下降(-26.7%,P=0.01)。所有使用外側楔型鞋墊的病人依從性均超過九成,可惜搭配護膝治療的依從性只有五成左右。步態分析顯示與平鞋墊比較,所有治療的峰值和平均膝蓋內收力矩均顯著下降。 結論:以上結果支持應在早期使用矯形治療醫治內側膝退化性關節炎。-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofHong Kong Medical Journal-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleProspective study on the effects of orthotic treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis in chinese patients: Clinical outcome and gait analysis-
dc.title矯形治療對於內側膝退化性關節炎華籍患者的效果:臨床結果和步態分析的前瞻性研究-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.12809/hkmj144311-
dc.identifier.pmid25756275-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84928743156-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage98-
dc.identifier.epage106-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000353253600002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats