File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The application of close incisional negative pressure wound therapy in revision arthroplasty among asian patients: a comparative study

TitleThe application of close incisional negative pressure wound therapy in revision arthroplasty among asian patients: a comparative study
Authors
KeywordsArthroplasty
Closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy
Periprosthetic joint infection
Surgical site infection
Issue Date2021
Citation
Arthroplasty, 2021, v. 3, n. 1, article no. 38 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was one of the main causes of revision of arthroplasty. In order to reduce wound complications and surgical site infections, close incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been introduced into arthroplasty. This study was designed to review the clinical benefits of the application of ciNPWT in revision arthroplasty. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective comparative study approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients, who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty or revision total hip arthroplasty at the author’s institution from January 2016 to October 2019, were included in this study. The ciNPWT cohort included all eligible patients, who underwent operations from January 2018 to October 2019, with the use of ciNPWT(n = 36). The control cohort included all eligible patients, who underwent operations from January 2016 to December 2017 with the use of conventional dressing(n = 48). The incidences of wound complications were compared to both cohorts. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) between control cohort and ciNPWT cohort (12.5% in control vs 0% in ciNPWT, p = 0.035). However, there was no statistically significance of the overall wound complication rate for both cohorts. (14.6% in control vs 8.3% in ciNPWT, p = 0.504). Conclusions: The application of ciNPWT could result in a lower rate of superficial surgical site infection when compared with conventional dressing among the patients undergoing revision total knee and total hip arthroplasties. Trial registration: UW19-706
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309452
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ping Keung-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Wing Chiu-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Kar Hei-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Winnie-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Vincent Wai Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Henry-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Man Hong-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Chun Hoi-
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Kwong Yuen-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T07:02:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T07:02:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationArthroplasty, 2021, v. 3, n. 1, article no. 38-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/309452-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was one of the main causes of revision of arthroplasty. In order to reduce wound complications and surgical site infections, close incisional negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been introduced into arthroplasty. This study was designed to review the clinical benefits of the application of ciNPWT in revision arthroplasty. Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective comparative study approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patients, who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty or revision total hip arthroplasty at the author’s institution from January 2016 to October 2019, were included in this study. The ciNPWT cohort included all eligible patients, who underwent operations from January 2018 to October 2019, with the use of ciNPWT(n = 36). The control cohort included all eligible patients, who underwent operations from January 2016 to December 2017 with the use of conventional dressing(n = 48). The incidences of wound complications were compared to both cohorts. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) between control cohort and ciNPWT cohort (12.5% in control vs 0% in ciNPWT, p = 0.035). However, there was no statistically significance of the overall wound complication rate for both cohorts. (14.6% in control vs 8.3% in ciNPWT, p = 0.504). Conclusions: The application of ciNPWT could result in a lower rate of superficial surgical site infection when compared with conventional dressing among the patients undergoing revision total knee and total hip arthroplasties. Trial registration: UW19-706-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofArthroplasty-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectArthroplasty-
dc.subjectClosed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy-
dc.subjectPeriprosthetic joint infection-
dc.subjectSurgical site infection-
dc.titleThe application of close incisional negative pressure wound therapy in revision arthroplasty among asian patients: a comparative study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s42836-021-00094-4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85118754219-
dc.identifier.volume3-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 38-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 38-
dc.identifier.eissn2524-7948-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000714014900001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats