File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of reverse transcription-PCR assays for rapid diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome associated with a novel coronavirus

TitleEvaluation of reverse transcription-PCR assays for rapid diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome associated with a novel coronavirus
Authors
Issue Date2003
PublisherAmerican Society for Microbiology.
Citation
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, v. 41 n. 10, p. 4521-4524 How to Cite?
AbstractThe reverse transcription (RT)-PCR protocols of two World Health Organization (WHO) severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) network laboratories (WHO SARS network laboratories at The University of Hong Kong [WHO-HKU] and at the Bernhard-Nocht Institute in Hamburg, Germany [WHO-Hamburg]) were evaluated for rapid diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (CoV) associated with SARS in Hong Kong. A total of 303 clinical specimens were collected from 163 patients suspected to have SARS. The end point of both WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays was determined to be 0.1 50% tissue culture infective dose. Using seroconversion to CoV as the "gold standard" for SARS CoV diagnosis, WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays exhibited diagnostic sensitivities of 61 and 68% (nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens), 65 and 72% (throat swab specimens), 50 and 54% (urine specimens), and 58 and 63% (stool specimens), respectively, with an overall specificity of 100%. For patients confirmed to have SARS CoV and from whom two or more respiratory specimens were collected, testing the second specimen increased the sensitivity from 64 and 71% to 75 and 79% for the WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays, respectively. Testing more than one respiratory specimen will maximize the sensitivity of PCR assays for SARS CoV.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/49238
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 11.677
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.349
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYam, WCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, KHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPoon, LLMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorGuan, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, KYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSeto, WHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPeiris, JSMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-12T06:37:21Z-
dc.date.available2008-06-12T06:37:21Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003, v. 41 n. 10, p. 4521-4524en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/49238-
dc.description.abstractThe reverse transcription (RT)-PCR protocols of two World Health Organization (WHO) severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) network laboratories (WHO SARS network laboratories at The University of Hong Kong [WHO-HKU] and at the Bernhard-Nocht Institute in Hamburg, Germany [WHO-Hamburg]) were evaluated for rapid diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (CoV) associated with SARS in Hong Kong. A total of 303 clinical specimens were collected from 163 patients suspected to have SARS. The end point of both WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays was determined to be 0.1 50% tissue culture infective dose. Using seroconversion to CoV as the "gold standard" for SARS CoV diagnosis, WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays exhibited diagnostic sensitivities of 61 and 68% (nasopharyngeal aspirate specimens), 65 and 72% (throat swab specimens), 50 and 54% (urine specimens), and 58 and 63% (stool specimens), respectively, with an overall specificity of 100%. For patients confirmed to have SARS CoV and from whom two or more respiratory specimens were collected, testing the second specimen increased the sensitivity from 64 and 71% to 75 and 79% for the WHO-HKU and WHO-Hamburg RT-PCR assays, respectively. Testing more than one respiratory specimen will maximize the sensitivity of PCR assays for SARS CoV.en_HK
dc.format.extent386 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypetext/html-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiology.en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - methods - standardsen_HK
dc.subject.meshSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome - diagnosis - virologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshSARS Virus - genetics - isolation & purificationen_HK
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificityen_HK
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_HK
dc.titleEvaluation of reverse transcription-PCR assays for rapid diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome associated with a novel coronavirusen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailYam, WC: wcyam@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailPoon, LLM: llmpoon@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailGuan, Y: yguan@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailYuen, KY: kyyuen@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailPeiris, JSM: malik@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYam, WC=rp00313en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPoon, LLM=rp00484en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityGuan, Y=rp00397en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYuen, KY=rp00366en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPeiris, JSM=rp00410en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltexten_HK
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/JCM.41.10.4521-4524.2003en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid14532176-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC254368en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0141993032en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros87567-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141993032&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume41en_HK
dc.identifier.issue10en_HK
dc.identifier.spage4521en_HK
dc.identifier.epage4524en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000185922900004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYam, WC=7004281720en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, KH=7406034307en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPoon, LLM=7005441747en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGuan, Y=7202924055en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYuen, KY=36078079100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSeto, WH=7005799377en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPeiris, JSM=7005486823en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0095-1137-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats