File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Questionnaire development: Face validity and item impact testing of the child oral health impact profile

TitleQuestionnaire development: Face validity and item impact testing of the child oral health impact profile
Authors
KeywordsOral health-related quality of life
Positive constructs
Questionnaire
Readability
Issue Date2007
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
Citation
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. S1, p. 8-19 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) was designed to assess oral-facial well-being in school-age children as reported by the child and via proxy report from a caregiver. This article describes the development of the COHIP using a multi-staged impact approach recommended by Guyatt et al. (Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 41). Methods: There were multiple phases to the development of the questionnaire: (i) initial pool of items developed from the literature and expert review; (ii) face validity of items; (iii) impact evaluation of the initial item pool; (iv) development of positive items and face validity of new items; (v) impact evaluation of the revised questionnaire and (vi) factor analysis and final revision of the questionnaire. Factor analysis was completed on the final questionnaire using data from the impact evaluation in order to evaluate whether the COHIP measured independent conceptual domains. Results: Factor analysis identified five domains: oral health, functional well-being, social/emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. Readability was calculated using the Flesch-Kinkaid readability score that was finalized at a 3.5 grade reading level. Finally, two response sets, and a revised format (e.g., including pictures, increasing font size, and shading every other item) were implemented to decrease respondent fatigue and increase accuracy of participant responses. Conclusions: The final questionnaire consisted of 34 items and five conceptually distinct subscales: oral health, functional well-being, social/emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. Subsequent papers present the validity and reliability of the COHIP. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66560
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.489
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.061
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBroder, HLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCisneros, GJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:47:23Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:47:23Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. S1, p. 8-19en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66560-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP) was designed to assess oral-facial well-being in school-age children as reported by the child and via proxy report from a caregiver. This article describes the development of the COHIP using a multi-staged impact approach recommended by Guyatt et al. (Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p. 41). Methods: There were multiple phases to the development of the questionnaire: (i) initial pool of items developed from the literature and expert review; (ii) face validity of items; (iii) impact evaluation of the initial item pool; (iv) development of positive items and face validity of new items; (v) impact evaluation of the revised questionnaire and (vi) factor analysis and final revision of the questionnaire. Factor analysis was completed on the final questionnaire using data from the impact evaluation in order to evaluate whether the COHIP measured independent conceptual domains. Results: Factor analysis identified five domains: oral health, functional well-being, social/emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. Readability was calculated using the Flesch-Kinkaid readability score that was finalized at a 3.5 grade reading level. Finally, two response sets, and a revised format (e.g., including pictures, increasing font size, and shading every other item) were implemented to decrease respondent fatigue and increase accuracy of participant responses. Conclusions: The final questionnaire consisted of 34 items and five conceptually distinct subscales: oral health, functional well-being, social/emotional well-being, school environment and self-image. Subsequent papers present the validity and reliability of the COHIP. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COMen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_HK
dc.subjectOral health-related quality of life-
dc.subjectPositive constructs-
dc.subjectQuestionnaire-
dc.subjectReadability-
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_HK
dc.subject.meshCanadaen_HK
dc.subject.meshChilden_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Health Surveysen_HK
dc.subject.meshFactor Analysis, Statisticalen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshOral Healthen_HK
dc.subject.meshQuality of Lifeen_HK
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_HK
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen_HK
dc.subject.meshUnited Statesen_HK
dc.titleQuestionnaire development: Face validity and item impact testing of the child oral health impact profileen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0301-5661&volume=35 &issue=Suppl 1&spage=8&epage=19&date=2007&atitle=Questionnaire+development:+face+validity+and+item+impact+testing+of+the+Child+Oral+Health+Impact+Profileen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C:mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00401.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid17615046-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34547332617en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros133003en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-34547332617&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume35en_HK
dc.identifier.issueSUPPL. 1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage8en_HK
dc.identifier.epage19en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000248371700002-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBroder, HL=7003709244en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCisneros, GJ=7006554425en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0301-5661-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats