File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A randomized double blinded study to assess the efficacy of a laser-guided collimator on dental radiography training

TitleA randomized double blinded study to assess the efficacy of a laser-guided collimator on dental radiography training
Authors
KeywordsEducation, dental
Radiation protection
Radiography, bitewing
Radiography, dental
Issue Date2006
PublisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/
Citation
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2006, v. 35 n. 3, p. 200-204 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To assess the effect of a laser-guided collimator in intraoral radiography training. Methods: A custom-made collimator with four red laser diodes on each corner on the rim of an aluminium alloy cubic housing was fabricated. The laser used low power diodes, which are classified as laser-safe by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). When activated, the effective dimensions of the laser beams were 4 cm × 4.5 cm. Eighteen dental hygiene students were randomized into test and control groups. The Laser group used a rectangular collimator with the laser device, while the Non-laser group used a conventional rectangular collimator. Each group attended nine intraoral radiography training sessions. All radiographs were assessed and were classified into three categories: Excellent, Acceptable and Repeat, by a masked academic staff member. Reasons for repeats were marked. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were made. Results: A total of 2334 radiographs were made. Conecut was more common on bitewings than periapicals. The Laser group produced fewer conecuts than the Non-laser group. The Laser group produced more excellent radiographs with fewer repeats than the Non-laser group, but there was not a significant difference. Conclusions: The laser-guided collimator helped the students to produce fewer repeats in a shorter period of time. It was an effective training aid. © 2006 The British Institute of Radiology.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66775
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.525
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.845
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChau, ACMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLi, TKLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:49:14Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2006, v. 35 n. 3, p. 200-204en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0250-832Xen_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66775-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To assess the effect of a laser-guided collimator in intraoral radiography training. Methods: A custom-made collimator with four red laser diodes on each corner on the rim of an aluminium alloy cubic housing was fabricated. The laser used low power diodes, which are classified as laser-safe by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). When activated, the effective dimensions of the laser beams were 4 cm × 4.5 cm. Eighteen dental hygiene students were randomized into test and control groups. The Laser group used a rectangular collimator with the laser device, while the Non-laser group used a conventional rectangular collimator. Each group attended nine intraoral radiography training sessions. All radiographs were assessed and were classified into three categories: Excellent, Acceptable and Repeat, by a masked academic staff member. Reasons for repeats were marked. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were made. Results: A total of 2334 radiographs were made. Conecut was more common on bitewings than periapicals. The Laser group produced fewer conecuts than the Non-laser group. The Laser group produced more excellent radiographs with fewer repeats than the Non-laser group, but there was not a significant difference. Conclusions: The laser-guided collimator helped the students to produce fewer repeats in a shorter period of time. It was an effective training aid. © 2006 The British Institute of Radiology.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiologyen_HK
dc.subjectEducation, dental-
dc.subjectRadiation protection-
dc.subjectRadiography, bitewing-
dc.subjectRadiography, dental-
dc.subject.meshDental Hygienists - educationen_HK
dc.subject.meshDouble-Blind Methoden_HK
dc.subject.meshFiltration - instrumentationen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshLasersen_HK
dc.subject.meshRadiography, Bitewing - instrumentationen_HK
dc.subject.meshRadiology - educationen_HK
dc.titleA randomized double blinded study to assess the efficacy of a laser-guided collimator on dental radiography trainingen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0250-832X&volume=35&spage=200&epage=204&date=2006&atitle=A+randomized+double+blinded+study+to+assess+the+efficacy+of+a+laser-guided+collimator+on+dental+radiography+trainingen_HK
dc.identifier.emailChau, ACM:ansonc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChau, ACM=rp00044en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr/84342351en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid16618855-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33646574611en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros120081en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33646574611&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume35en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3en_HK
dc.identifier.spage200en_HK
dc.identifier.epage204en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000237508600013-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChau, ACM=9633648600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLi, TKL=24352391500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, J=24407373900en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0250-832X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats