File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei
Title | A Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei 幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析 |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Kindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師) Compensation (工資待遇) Shenzhen (深圳) Hong Kong (香港) Taipei (臺北) |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Publisher | Zhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.html |
Citation | Early Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite? 幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers. 分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845 |
ISSN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Y | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-18T04:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-06-18T04:20:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Early Childhood Education, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 幼兒教育, 2013, v. 577 n. 3, p. 9-13 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1004-4604 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/183845 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The comparison of kindergarten teacher compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei shows: 1) Hong Kong features the simplest compensation structure, which has no allowance, incentive, or benefits, whereas Taipei has the most comprehensive and generous compensation with Shenzhen between them; 2) Shenzhen and Taipei employ the post performance salary system, whereas Hong Kong uses competency-based salary system; and 3) Taipei teacher has the highest value of compensation, whereas Hong Kong teacher has the least purchasing power. Accordingly, the following suggestions are made for Hong Kong: enrich and improve the teacher compensation system, launch the post performance salary system and introduce the housing, transportation, and education allowances for kindergarten teachers. | - |
dc.description.abstract | 分析深圳、香港和臺北三地公辦(非牟利)幼兒園教師的工資待遇發現:(1)香港幼兒園教師的工資架構比較單一,沒有津貼、獎金或福利;臺北幼兒園教師的工資架構最為全面、合理、人性化;深圳介于二者之間。(2)深圳和臺北均采用崗位績效工資制,而香港是名義上的能力工資制。(3)臺北幼兒園教師的工資水平是三地中最高的。在扣除每月房租后,香港幼兒園教師的工資實際購買力最低。針對香港幼兒園教師工資待遇最低的問題,研究者建議香港特區政府進一步完善幼兒園教師的工資架構,考慮采用崗位績效工資制,發放住房、交通、教育等津貼。 | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Zhejiang Educational Press Group (浙江教育報刊總社). The Journal's web site is located at http://www.zjjybkzs.com/182/257/1.html | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Early Childhood Education | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | 幼兒教育 | - |
dc.subject | Kindergarten teachers (幼兒園教師) | - |
dc.subject | Compensation (工資待遇) | - |
dc.subject | Shenzhen (深圳) | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong (香港) | - |
dc.subject | Taipei (臺北) | - |
dc.title | A Comparison of Kindergarten Teacher Compensation between Shenzhen, Hong Kong and Taipei | en_US |
dc.title | 幼兒園教師工資待遇比較研究(四) 深圳、香港、臺北幼兒園教師工資待遇比較分析 | - |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Li, H: huili@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Li, H=rp00926 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 214698 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 577 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 13 | en_US |
dc.publisher.place | China | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1004-4604 | - |