File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: A discourse analysis of PhD dissertations written in Chinese
Title | A discourse analysis of PhD dissertations written in Chinese |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Publisher | Birkbeck, University of London. |
Citation | The Annual Bloomsbury Round Table on Communication, Cognition and Culture, London, United Kingdom, 11-13 June 2014. In the Booklet of the Annual Bloomsbury Round Table on Communication, Cognition and Culture, 2014, p. 71-72 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In view of the increasing importance of the Chinese language internationally now
and in the future, research published in Chinese will be receiving more attention,
and how to write about research in this language is worth studying, including the
writing of PhD dissertations. The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings
of an analysis of the discourse of 60 Chinese PhD dissertations. These
dissertations are from a leading comprehensive university in China, covering six
disciplines – applied linguistics, public administration, business studies,
computer science, electronic engineering and biology. The analysis was
conducted from three perspectives. Firstly, the structures of these dissertations
were identified, being the traditional-complex type (Introduction-Literature
Review-Methodology-Results/Findings-Discussion –Conclusions) or topic-based
(Introduction-Theme/Topic 1-Theme/Topic 2-Theme/Topic 3-Conclusion)
(Paltridge, 2003). Then the genetic moves in the Introduction chapter and the
Conclusion chapter were analyzed using the genre approach (Swales, 1990).
These moves include general background to the study, general review of the
literature, and general introduction to the main study in the Introduction;
summary of major findings, overall conclusions (and implications), and directions
for future research in the Conclusion, albeit some are field-oriented while others
are thesis-oriented. Finally linguistic devices employed by the authors to express
stances were examined, including the use of hedges (eg. keneng [may], jianyi
[suggest]), boosters (eg. xian’er yijian [obviously], shiji shang [in fact]), attitude
markers (eg. ling ren chijing de shi [surprisingly], you yisi de shi [interestingly]),
engagement markers (eg. zhuyi [note that], (duzhe/nin) keyi kanchu [you can see
that]), and self-mentions (eg. wo [I] and wo’men [we]) (Hyland, 2004). These
perspectives were then compared cross disciplines with a view to delineating the
construction of disciplinary identities (Hyland, 2012). Being expandable to
include a larger number of dissertations in more disciplines, this research will
enrich the literature on academic writing in Chinese. It will also have useful
implications for writing Chinese PhD dissertations as well as the teaching of it. |
Description | Theme: The Third International Symposium on Chinese Language and Discourse The Booklet can be viewed at: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/linguistics/downloads/Conference%20Booklet.pdf/ |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/205174 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, W | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-20T01:54:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-20T01:54:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The Annual Bloomsbury Round Table on Communication, Cognition and Culture, London, United Kingdom, 11-13 June 2014. In the Booklet of the Annual Bloomsbury Round Table on Communication, Cognition and Culture, 2014, p. 71-72 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/205174 | - |
dc.description | Theme: The Third International Symposium on Chinese Language and Discourse | - |
dc.description | The Booklet can be viewed at: http://www.bbk.ac.uk/linguistics/downloads/Conference%20Booklet.pdf/ | - |
dc.description.abstract | In view of the increasing importance of the Chinese language internationally now and in the future, research published in Chinese will be receiving more attention, and how to write about research in this language is worth studying, including the writing of PhD dissertations. The purpose of this paper is to report on the findings of an analysis of the discourse of 60 Chinese PhD dissertations. These dissertations are from a leading comprehensive university in China, covering six disciplines – applied linguistics, public administration, business studies, computer science, electronic engineering and biology. The analysis was conducted from three perspectives. Firstly, the structures of these dissertations were identified, being the traditional-complex type (Introduction-Literature Review-Methodology-Results/Findings-Discussion –Conclusions) or topic-based (Introduction-Theme/Topic 1-Theme/Topic 2-Theme/Topic 3-Conclusion) (Paltridge, 2003). Then the genetic moves in the Introduction chapter and the Conclusion chapter were analyzed using the genre approach (Swales, 1990). These moves include general background to the study, general review of the literature, and general introduction to the main study in the Introduction; summary of major findings, overall conclusions (and implications), and directions for future research in the Conclusion, albeit some are field-oriented while others are thesis-oriented. Finally linguistic devices employed by the authors to express stances were examined, including the use of hedges (eg. keneng [may], jianyi [suggest]), boosters (eg. xian’er yijian [obviously], shiji shang [in fact]), attitude markers (eg. ling ren chijing de shi [surprisingly], you yisi de shi [interestingly]), engagement markers (eg. zhuyi [note that], (duzhe/nin) keyi kanchu [you can see that]), and self-mentions (eg. wo [I] and wo’men [we]) (Hyland, 2004). These perspectives were then compared cross disciplines with a view to delineating the construction of disciplinary identities (Hyland, 2012). Being expandable to include a larger number of dissertations in more disciplines, this research will enrich the literature on academic writing in Chinese. It will also have useful implications for writing Chinese PhD dissertations as well as the teaching of it. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Birkbeck, University of London. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Annual Bloomsbury Round Table on Communication, Cognition and Culture | en_US |
dc.title | A discourse analysis of PhD dissertations written in Chinese | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, W: wwfeng@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 235454 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 71 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 72 | - |
dc.publisher.place | London | - |