File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1816910
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85090987401
- PMID: 32924775
- WOS: WOS:000569353400001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Impact of past behaviour normality: meta-analysis of exceptionality effect
Title | Impact of past behaviour normality: meta-analysis of exceptionality effect |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Norm theory normality regret past behaviour exception routine |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Psychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pcem20 |
Citation | Cognition and Emotion, 2021, v. 35 n. 1, p. 129-149 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Exceptionality effect is the phenomenon that people associate stronger negative affect with a negative outcome when it is a result of an exception (abnormal behaviour) compared to when it is a result of routine (normal behaviour). In this pre-registered meta-analysis, we examined exceptionality effect in 48 studies (N = 4212). An analysis of 35 experimental studies (n = 3332) showed medium to strong effect (g = 0.60, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [0.41, 0.79]) for past behaviour across several measures (regret/affect: g = 0.66, counterfactual thought: g = 0.39, self-blame: g = 0.44, victim compensation: g = 0.39, offender punishment: g = 0.51). An analysis of 13 one-sample studies presenting a comparison of exceptional and routine behaviours simultaneously (n = 1217) revealed a very strong exceptionality effect (converted g = 1.98, CI [1.57, 2.38]). We tested several theoretical moderators: norm strength, event controllability, outcome rarity, action versus inaction, and status quo. We found that exceptionality effect was stronger when the routine was aligned with the status quo option and with action rather than for inaction. All materials are available on: https://osf.io/542c7/ |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/295468 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.110 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Fillon, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kutscher, L | - |
dc.contributor.author | Feldman, G | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-25T11:15:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-25T11:15:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Cognition and Emotion, 2021, v. 35 n. 1, p. 129-149 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0269-9931 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/295468 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Exceptionality effect is the phenomenon that people associate stronger negative affect with a negative outcome when it is a result of an exception (abnormal behaviour) compared to when it is a result of routine (normal behaviour). In this pre-registered meta-analysis, we examined exceptionality effect in 48 studies (N = 4212). An analysis of 35 experimental studies (n = 3332) showed medium to strong effect (g = 0.60, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [0.41, 0.79]) for past behaviour across several measures (regret/affect: g = 0.66, counterfactual thought: g = 0.39, self-blame: g = 0.44, victim compensation: g = 0.39, offender punishment: g = 0.51). An analysis of 13 one-sample studies presenting a comparison of exceptional and routine behaviours simultaneously (n = 1217) revealed a very strong exceptionality effect (converted g = 1.98, CI [1.57, 2.38]). We tested several theoretical moderators: norm strength, event controllability, outcome rarity, action versus inaction, and status quo. We found that exceptionality effect was stronger when the routine was aligned with the status quo option and with action rather than for inaction. All materials are available on: https://osf.io/542c7/ | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Psychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pcem20 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Cognition and Emotion | - |
dc.rights | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Emotion on 13 Sep 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02699931.2020.1816910 | - |
dc.subject | Norm theory | - |
dc.subject | normality | - |
dc.subject | regret | - |
dc.subject | past behaviour | - |
dc.subject | exception routine | - |
dc.title | Impact of past behaviour normality: meta-analysis of exceptionality effect | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Feldman, G: gfeldman@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Feldman, G=rp02342 | - |
dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02699931.2020.1816910 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32924775 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85090987401 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 320965 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 129 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 149 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000569353400001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |