File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2307/2676254
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0034553753
- WOS: WOS:000165871300002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The accuracy of trade classification rules: Evidence from Nasdaq
Title | The accuracy of trade classification rules: Evidence from Nasdaq |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2000 |
Citation | Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000, v. 35, n. 4, p. 529-551 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Researchers are increasingly using data from the Nasdaq market to examine pricing behavior, market design, and other microstructure phenomena. The validity of any study that classifies trades as buys or sells depends on the accuracy of the classification method. Using a Nasdaq proprietary data set that identifies trade direction, we examine the validity of several trade classification algorithms. We find that the quote rule, the tick rule, and the Lee and Ready (1991) rule correctly classify 76.4%, 77.66%, and 81.05% of the trades, respectively. However, all classification rules have only a very limited success in classifying trades executed inside the quotes, introducing a bias in the accuracy of classifying large trades, trades during high volume periods, and ECN trades. We also find that extant algorithms do a mediocre job when used for calculating effective spreads. For Nasdaq trades, we propose a new and simple classification algorithm that improves over extant algorithms. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326027 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.980 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ellis, Katrina | - |
dc.contributor.author | Michaely, Roni | - |
dc.contributor.author | O'Hara, Maureen | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-09T09:57:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-03-09T09:57:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000, v. 35, n. 4, p. 529-551 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1090 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/326027 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Researchers are increasingly using data from the Nasdaq market to examine pricing behavior, market design, and other microstructure phenomena. The validity of any study that classifies trades as buys or sells depends on the accuracy of the classification method. Using a Nasdaq proprietary data set that identifies trade direction, we examine the validity of several trade classification algorithms. We find that the quote rule, the tick rule, and the Lee and Ready (1991) rule correctly classify 76.4%, 77.66%, and 81.05% of the trades, respectively. However, all classification rules have only a very limited success in classifying trades executed inside the quotes, introducing a bias in the accuracy of classifying large trades, trades during high volume periods, and ECN trades. We also find that extant algorithms do a mediocre job when used for calculating effective spreads. For Nasdaq trades, we propose a new and simple classification algorithm that improves over extant algorithms. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis | - |
dc.title | The accuracy of trade classification rules: Evidence from Nasdaq | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2307/2676254 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0034553753 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 529 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 551 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000165871300002 | - |