File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science

TitleConstructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science
Authors
Keywordsacademic writing
interaction
popular science
research articles
Issue Date2010
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jeap
Citation
Journal Of English For Academic Purposes, 2010, v. 9 n. 2, p. 116-127 How to Cite?
AbstractThe view of academic discourse as a rhetorical activity involving interactions between writers and readers is now central to most perspectives on EAP, but these interactions are conducted differently in different disciplinary and generic contexts. In this paper I use the term proximity to refer to a writer's control of those rhetorical features which display both authority as an expert and a personal position towards issues in an unfolding text. Examining a corpus of texts in two very different genres, research papers and popular science articles, I attempt to highlight some of the ways writers manage their display of expertise and interactions with readers through rhetorical choices which textually construct both the writer and the reader as people with similar understandings and goals. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/130159
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.589
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHyland, Ken_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-23T08:47:33Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-23T08:47:33Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of English For Academic Purposes, 2010, v. 9 n. 2, p. 116-127en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1475-1585en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/130159-
dc.description.abstractThe view of academic discourse as a rhetorical activity involving interactions between writers and readers is now central to most perspectives on EAP, but these interactions are conducted differently in different disciplinary and generic contexts. In this paper I use the term proximity to refer to a writer's control of those rhetorical features which display both authority as an expert and a personal position towards issues in an unfolding text. Examining a corpus of texts in two very different genres, research papers and popular science articles, I attempt to highlight some of the ways writers manage their display of expertise and interactions with readers through rhetorical choices which textually construct both the writer and the reader as people with similar understandings and goals. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jeapen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of English for Academic Purposesen_HK
dc.rightsNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of English for Academic Purposes. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2010, v. 9 n. 2, p. 116-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectacademic writingen_HK
dc.subjectinteractionen_HK
dc.subjectpopular scienceen_HK
dc.subjectresearch articlesen_HK
dc.titleConstructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional scienceen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1475-1585&volume=9&issue=2&spage=116&epage=127&date=2010&atitle=Constructing+proximity:+relating+to+readers+in+popular+and+professional+science-
dc.identifier.emailHyland, K:khyland@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHyland, K=rp01133en_HK
dc.description.naturepostprinten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77952106436en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros177329-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952106436&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume9en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage116en_HK
dc.identifier.epage127en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000208470300004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike6774946-
dc.identifier.issnl1475-1585-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats