File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.032
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-78751582095
- PMID: 21129836
- WOS: WOS:000287002500014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation
Title | Comparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||
Publisher | WB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joms | ||||
Citation | Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011, v. 69 n. 2, p. 409-417 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | Purpose: This study compared transport distraction with costochondral graft in the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with disc preservation. Materials and Methods: Bilateral condylectomies with disc preservation were conducted in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on 1 side and costochondral graft on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, and condylar remodeling were assessed by clinical, radiologic, and histologic examinations. Results: Transport distraction and costochondral graft established a new condyle separating from the preserved disc with a joint space. Both techniques showed no significant difference in ankylosis scores up to 24 weeks. Signs of calcification were not noted in the transport distraction or costochondral graft side. No significant change of maximal jaw movements was found at any time point from 2 to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ reconstruction. No significant difference between these 2 techniques in reconstruction of the TMJ was noted. © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/133573 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.684 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This investigation was supported by a small project funding from the University of Hong Kong (10205073/10971/08002/23/01). We also acknowledge valuable technical assistance from the Laboratory Animal Unit of the Li Ka Sling Faculty of Medicine, and the Centralized Research Laboratories and Oral Radiology Unit of the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, LW | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, L | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Shi, XJ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Zwahlen, RA | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, LK | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T02:10:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T02:10:47Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011, v. 69 n. 2, p. 409-417 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0278-2391 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/133573 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study compared transport distraction with costochondral graft in the reconstruction of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with disc preservation. Materials and Methods: Bilateral condylectomies with disc preservation were conducted in 12 adult goats. Transport distraction of the mandibular ramus was performed on 1 side and costochondral graft on the other side. Jaw movements, TMJ healing, and condylar remodeling were assessed by clinical, radiologic, and histologic examinations. Results: Transport distraction and costochondral graft established a new condyle separating from the preserved disc with a joint space. Both techniques showed no significant difference in ankylosis scores up to 24 weeks. Signs of calcification were not noted in the transport distraction or costochondral graft side. No significant change of maximal jaw movements was found at any time point from 2 to 24 weeks. Conclusions: Distraction osteogenesis is an effective reconstruction method for TMJ reconstruction. No significant difference between these 2 techniques in reconstruction of the TMJ was noted. © 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | WB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joms | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | en_HK |
dc.title | Comparison of distraction osteogenesis versus costochondral graft in reconstruction of temporomandibular joint condylectomy with disc preservation | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0278-2391&volume=69&issue=2&spage=409&epage=414&date=2011&atitle=Comparison+of+distraction+osteogenesis+versus+costochondral+graft+in+reconstruction+of+temporomandibular+joint+condylectomy+with+disc+preservation | - |
dc.identifier.email | Zheng, LW:lwzheng@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Zwahlen, RA:zwahlen@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, LK:lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Zheng, LW=rp01411 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Zwahlen, RA=rp00055 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, LK=rp00013 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.032 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21129836 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-78751582095 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185331 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78751582095&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 69 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 409 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 417 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000287002500014 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zheng, LW=11241247300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ma, L=36072648200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Shi, XJ=16231469600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zwahlen, RA=7004217269 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheung, LK=7102302747 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0278-2391 | - |