File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Gender differences in rehabilitation outcomes among older Chinese patients

TitleGender differences in rehabilitation outcomes among older Chinese patients
Authors
KeywordsChinese elderly
Gender differences
Geriatric rehabilitation
Rehabilitation outcomes
Issue Date2011
PublisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/archger
Citation
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2011, v. 52 n. 1, p. 28-32 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough gender differences have been demonstrated in cardiac and stroke rehabilitation, it remains unclear whether there are gender differences in geriatric rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between gender and rehabilitation outcomes. We studied 1795 patients in two convalescence hospitals in Hong Kong. We defined absolute functional and motor gains as Barthel Index (BI) efficacy and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) efficacy while BI and EMS efficiency were efficacy divided by the length of stay. Satisfactory motor and functional outcomes were defined as discharge EMS >/= 15 and BI >/= 75. Compared with men, women had higher BI but lower EMS on admission and discharge. EMS and BI efficacy and efficiency were similar in both sexes. Female gender was a significant negative predictor for satisfactory motor outcome (p=0.0002) but a positive predictor for functional outcome (p=0.0007). Other predictors for satisfactory motor outcome were: age (p<0.001); urinary incontinence (p=0.0049); living at home (p=0.0056); admission EMS (p<0.001); admission BI (p=0.044). Other predictors for satisfactory functional outcome were: age (p=0.009); infection other than chest (p=0.047); urinary incontinence (p<0.001); Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p=0.0004); admission EMS (p=0.005); BI (p<0.001). Women achieved a better functional outcome but a poorer motor outcome on discharge. Female gender was a positive predictor for functional outcome but a negative factor for motor outcome.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/139464
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.163
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.985
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuk, JKHen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PKCen_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, LWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-23T05:50:22Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-23T05:50:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 2011, v. 52 n. 1, p. 28-32en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-4943-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/139464-
dc.description.abstractAlthough gender differences have been demonstrated in cardiac and stroke rehabilitation, it remains unclear whether there are gender differences in geriatric rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between gender and rehabilitation outcomes. We studied 1795 patients in two convalescence hospitals in Hong Kong. We defined absolute functional and motor gains as Barthel Index (BI) efficacy and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) efficacy while BI and EMS efficiency were efficacy divided by the length of stay. Satisfactory motor and functional outcomes were defined as discharge EMS >/= 15 and BI >/= 75. Compared with men, women had higher BI but lower EMS on admission and discharge. EMS and BI efficacy and efficiency were similar in both sexes. Female gender was a significant negative predictor for satisfactory motor outcome (p=0.0002) but a positive predictor for functional outcome (p=0.0007). Other predictors for satisfactory motor outcome were: age (p<0.001); urinary incontinence (p=0.0049); living at home (p=0.0056); admission EMS (p<0.001); admission BI (p=0.044). Other predictors for satisfactory functional outcome were: age (p=0.009); infection other than chest (p=0.047); urinary incontinence (p<0.001); Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (p=0.0004); admission EMS (p=0.005); BI (p<0.001). Women achieved a better functional outcome but a poorer motor outcome on discharge. Female gender was a positive predictor for functional outcome but a negative factor for motor outcome.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/archger-
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Gerontology and Geriatricsen_US
dc.subjectChinese elderly-
dc.subjectGender differences-
dc.subjectGeriatric rehabilitation-
dc.subjectRehabilitation outcomes-
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshGeriatric Assessment-
dc.subject.meshHong Kong-
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.meshUrinary Incontinence - rehabilitation-
dc.titleGender differences in rehabilitation outcomes among older Chinese patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLuk, JKH: jkhluk@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChu, LW: lwchu@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.archger.2010.01.016-
dc.identifier.pmid20202703-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78649703120-
dc.identifier.hkuros194545en_US
dc.identifier.volume52en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage28en_US
dc.identifier.epage32en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000284827100019-
dc.publisher.placeIreland-
dc.identifier.citeulike6771575-
dc.identifier.issnl0167-4943-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats