File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: Analgesic effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine in third molar surgery under local anaesthesia

TitleAnalgesic effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine in third molar surgery under local anaesthesia
Authors
KeywordsDexmedetomidine
Intranasal
Analgesia
Issue Date2010
PublisherInternational Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).
Citation
The 13th World Congress on Pain (IASP 2010), Montréal, Canada, 29 August-2 September 2010. How to Cite?
AbstractDexmedetomidine is an alpha 2 agonist. Activation of central alpha 2-adrenoreceptors in the locus ceruleus is responsible for both analgesic and sedative effects. However, its analgesic effect is controversial in clinical practice. We aim to evaluate analgesic effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine when it was used for conscious sedation in unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. After IRB approval, 60 patients scheduled to have unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia with conscious sedation were recruited into this double blind randomized control trial. They were randomly allocated to receive either intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (group D) or normal saline as placebo (group P) 45 minutes before surgery. Patient controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol was provided as rescue sedative. Pain on administration of dexmedetomidine, cannulation and local anaesthetic infiltration were evaluated. Postoperative pain scores as numerical rate scale (NRS) up to postoperative 72nd hour, adverse events, time to first analgesic, analgesic consumption and global pain satisfaction were also explored. After administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine, group D patients were more sedated before surgery (p<0.05) and used less rescue PCS propofol (p=0.003). No significant difference in pain on administration of dexmedetomidine, cannulation and local anaesthetic infiltration was found. Postoperative median NRS pain scores at specific time point were similar during the whole study period. However, the areas under curves (AUC) for NRS scores of postoperative resting pain from 1 to 12 hours was significantly lower (p=0.017) for group D. Incidence of side effects and global pain satisfaction between 2 groups were similar. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to offer better postoperative analgesic effect when it was used for conscious sedation in unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. No increase in postoperative adverse event was found.
DescriptionPoster Presentation: no. PW333
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/140020

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CWen_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-23T06:05:06Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-23T06:05:06Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 13th World Congress on Pain (IASP 2010), Montréal, Canada, 29 August-2 September 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/140020-
dc.descriptionPoster Presentation: no. PW333-
dc.description.abstractDexmedetomidine is an alpha 2 agonist. Activation of central alpha 2-adrenoreceptors in the locus ceruleus is responsible for both analgesic and sedative effects. However, its analgesic effect is controversial in clinical practice. We aim to evaluate analgesic effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine when it was used for conscious sedation in unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. After IRB approval, 60 patients scheduled to have unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia with conscious sedation were recruited into this double blind randomized control trial. They were randomly allocated to receive either intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (group D) or normal saline as placebo (group P) 45 minutes before surgery. Patient controlled sedation (PCS) with propofol was provided as rescue sedative. Pain on administration of dexmedetomidine, cannulation and local anaesthetic infiltration were evaluated. Postoperative pain scores as numerical rate scale (NRS) up to postoperative 72nd hour, adverse events, time to first analgesic, analgesic consumption and global pain satisfaction were also explored. After administration of intranasal dexmedetomidine, group D patients were more sedated before surgery (p<0.05) and used less rescue PCS propofol (p=0.003). No significant difference in pain on administration of dexmedetomidine, cannulation and local anaesthetic infiltration was found. Postoperative median NRS pain scores at specific time point were similar during the whole study period. However, the areas under curves (AUC) for NRS scores of postoperative resting pain from 1 to 12 hours was significantly lower (p=0.017) for group D. Incidence of side effects and global pain satisfaction between 2 groups were similar. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to offer better postoperative analgesic effect when it was used for conscious sedation in unilateral third molar surgery under local anaesthesia. No increase in postoperative adverse event was found.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Congress on Pain, IASP 2010en_US
dc.subjectDexmedetomidine-
dc.subjectIntranasal-
dc.subjectAnalgesia-
dc.titleAnalgesic effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine in third molar surgery under local anaesthesiaen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailCheung, CW: cheucw@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailNg, J: jkfng@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailIrwin, M: mgirwin@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, CW=rp00244en_US
dc.identifier.authorityNg, J=rp00544en_US
dc.identifier.authorityIrwin, M=rp00390en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros193488en_US
dc.description.otherThe 13th World Congress on Pain, Montréal, Canada, 29 August-2 September 2010.-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats