Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s12529-011-9146-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84863777231
- PMID: 21279709
- WOS: WOS:000304399500011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Confirmatory factor analysis of the stagnation scale-a traditional chinese medicine construct operationalized for mental health practice
Title | Confirmatory factor analysis of the stagnation scale-a traditional chinese medicine construct operationalized for mental health practice |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Confirmatory factor analysis Cutoff Scale validation Stagnation |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/journal/12529 |
Citation | International Journal Of Behavioral Medicine, 2012, v. 19 n. 2, p. 228-233 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background Traditional Chinese medicine stagnation ("yu") syndrome is characterized by a cluster of mind/body obstruction-like symptoms. Previous studies have operationalized the concept as a psychological construct through scale development, producing a three-factor 16-item inventory with good psychometric properties. Purpose The study aimed to further validate the Stagnation Scale by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and examine self-appraisal of stagnation as an illness. Method A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on a random community sample of 755 adults recruited by cluster sampling in Hong Kong. Results CFA revealed a good fit of the three-factor model (CFI=.95; RMSEA=.077; SRMR=.043). ROC analysis suggested a cutoff score at 50 on stagnation total score for predicting self-appraisal of an illness condition, with false positive and negative rates at 25.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Overall, 6.2% participants self-appraised to suffer stagnation symptoms to a degree of an illness, and for it, 1.9% participants intended to seek treatment. Stagnation showed positive correlations with physical distress, depression, and anxiety (r=.59-.76, p<.01) and negative correlation with age (r=?.22, p<.01). Conclusion The Stagnation Scale appeared to be robust in factorial and construct validity. With prevalence of illness by self-appraisal at 6.2% and intention for treatment at 1.9%, stagnation is a fairly common condition associated with treatment-seeking behaviors. © International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2011. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/143090 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.013 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, SM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fong, TCT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, XL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, YJ | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-28T03:08:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-10-28T03:08:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal Of Behavioral Medicine, 2012, v. 19 n. 2, p. 228-233 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1070-5503 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/143090 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background Traditional Chinese medicine stagnation ("yu") syndrome is characterized by a cluster of mind/body obstruction-like symptoms. Previous studies have operationalized the concept as a psychological construct through scale development, producing a three-factor 16-item inventory with good psychometric properties. Purpose The study aimed to further validate the Stagnation Scale by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and examine self-appraisal of stagnation as an illness. Method A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on a random community sample of 755 adults recruited by cluster sampling in Hong Kong. Results CFA revealed a good fit of the three-factor model (CFI=.95; RMSEA=.077; SRMR=.043). ROC analysis suggested a cutoff score at 50 on stagnation total score for predicting self-appraisal of an illness condition, with false positive and negative rates at 25.8% and 23.3%, respectively. Overall, 6.2% participants self-appraised to suffer stagnation symptoms to a degree of an illness, and for it, 1.9% participants intended to seek treatment. Stagnation showed positive correlations with physical distress, depression, and anxiety (r=.59-.76, p<.01) and negative correlation with age (r=?.22, p<.01). Conclusion The Stagnation Scale appeared to be robust in factorial and construct validity. With prevalence of illness by self-appraisal at 6.2% and intention for treatment at 1.9%, stagnation is a fairly common condition associated with treatment-seeking behaviors. © International Society of Behavioral Medicine 2011. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/medicine/journal/12529 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | en_HK |
dc.rights | The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | en_US |
dc.subject | Confirmatory factor analysis | en_HK |
dc.subject | Cutoff | en_HK |
dc.subject | Scale validation | en_HK |
dc.subject | Stagnation | en_HK |
dc.title | Confirmatory factor analysis of the stagnation scale-a traditional chinese medicine construct operationalized for mental health practice | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4551/resserv?sid=springerlink&genre=article&atitle=Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Stagnation Scale—A Traditional Chinese Medicine Construct Operationalized for Mental Health Practice&title=International Journal of Behavioral Medicine&issn=10705503&date=2011-01-30& spage=1&authors=Siu-man Ng, Ted Chun Tat Fong, Xiao-lu Wang, <i>et al.</i> | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, SM: ngsiuman@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, XL: wangxl@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, SM=rp00611 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wang, XL=rp00877 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12529-011-9146-9 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21279709 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84863777231 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 184564 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 202678 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863777231&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 228 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 233 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1532-7558 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000304399500011 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.description.other | Springer Open Choice, 21 Feb 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, SM=7403358478 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fong, TCT=35181175800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wang, XL=36859773100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wang, YJ=55312454200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 8767924 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1070-5503 | - |