File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Low handgrip strength is a predictor of osteoporotic fractures: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study

TitleLow handgrip strength is a predictor of osteoporotic fractures: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study
Authors
KeywordsFalls
Fracture
Handgrip strength
Osteoporosis
Issue Date2012
PublisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springerlink.com/content/0161-9152/
Citation
Age, 2012, v. 34 n. 5, p. 1239-1248 How to Cite?
AbstractHandgrip strength (HGS) is a potentially useful objective parameter to predict fracture since it is an indicator of general muscle strength and is associated with fragility and propensity to fall. Our objective was to examine the association of HGS with fracture, to evaluate the accuracy of HGS in predicting incident fracture, and to identify subjects at risk of fracture. We analyzed a cross-sectional cohort with 2,793 subjects (1,217 men and 1,576 women aged 50-101 years) and a subset of 1,702 subjects which were followed for a total of 4,855 person-years. The primary outcome measures were prevalent fractures and incident major fragility fractures. Each standard deviation (SD) reduction in HGS was associated with a 1.24-fold increased odds for major clinical fractures even after adjustment for other clinical factors. A similar result was obtained in the prospective cohort with each SD reduction in HGS being associated with a 1.57-fold increased hazard ratio of fracture even after adjustment for clinical factors. A combination of HGS and femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) T-score values (combined T-score), together with other clinical factors, had a better predictive power of incident fractures than FN BMD or HGS T-score alone with clinical factors. In addition, combined T-score has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting incidence fractures than FN BMD alone. This study is the first study to compare the predictive ability of HGS and BMD. We showed that HGS is an independent risk factor for major clinical fractures. Compared with using FN BMD T-score of -2.5 alone, HGS alone has a comparable predictive power to BMD, and the combined T-score may be useful to identify extra subjects at risk of clinical fractures with improved specificity. © The Author(s) 2011.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/144931
ISSN
2018 Impact Factor: 4.648
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTan, KCBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBow, CHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSoong, CSSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLoong, CHNen_HK
dc.contributor.authorKung, AWCen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-21T05:43:19Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-21T05:43:19Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAge, 2012, v. 34 n. 5, p. 1239-1248en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0161-9152en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/144931-
dc.description.abstractHandgrip strength (HGS) is a potentially useful objective parameter to predict fracture since it is an indicator of general muscle strength and is associated with fragility and propensity to fall. Our objective was to examine the association of HGS with fracture, to evaluate the accuracy of HGS in predicting incident fracture, and to identify subjects at risk of fracture. We analyzed a cross-sectional cohort with 2,793 subjects (1,217 men and 1,576 women aged 50-101 years) and a subset of 1,702 subjects which were followed for a total of 4,855 person-years. The primary outcome measures were prevalent fractures and incident major fragility fractures. Each standard deviation (SD) reduction in HGS was associated with a 1.24-fold increased odds for major clinical fractures even after adjustment for other clinical factors. A similar result was obtained in the prospective cohort with each SD reduction in HGS being associated with a 1.57-fold increased hazard ratio of fracture even after adjustment for clinical factors. A combination of HGS and femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) T-score values (combined T-score), together with other clinical factors, had a better predictive power of incident fractures than FN BMD or HGS T-score alone with clinical factors. In addition, combined T-score has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting incidence fractures than FN BMD alone. This study is the first study to compare the predictive ability of HGS and BMD. We showed that HGS is an independent risk factor for major clinical fractures. Compared with using FN BMD T-score of -2.5 alone, HGS alone has a comparable predictive power to BMD, and the combined T-score may be useful to identify extra subjects at risk of clinical fractures with improved specificity. © The Author(s) 2011.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springerlink.com/content/0161-9152/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAgeen_HK
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectFallsen_HK
dc.subjectFractureen_HK
dc.subjectHandgrip strengthen_HK
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_HK
dc.titleLow handgrip strength is a predictor of osteoporotic fractures: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Studyen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailCheung, CL: lung1212@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailTan, KCB: kcbtan@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailKung, AWC: awckung@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, CL=rp01749en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityTan, KCB=rp00402en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityKung, AWC=rp00368en_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11357-011-9297-2en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid21853264en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84867575842en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros192167-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84867575842&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume34en_HK
dc.identifier.issue5en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1239en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1248en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1574-4647en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000309170600015-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_HK
dc.description.otherSpringer Open Choice, 21 Feb 2012en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, CL=14520953400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTan, KCB=8082703100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBow, CH=36055977600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSoong, CSS=36769165800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLoong, CHN=36768353300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKung, AWC=7102322339en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike9822336-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats