File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.12.003
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-42649112065
- PMID: 18242124
- WOS: WOS:000256391600011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in children
Title | Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in children |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) Nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (NPFS) Rapid diagnosis Respiratory viruses |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcv |
Citation | Journal Of Clinical Virology, 2008, v. 42 n. 1, p. 65-69 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The quality of clinical specimens is a crucial determinant for virological diagnosis. Objectives: We compared the viral diagnostic yield for influenza A and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from the recently developed nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (NPFS) with nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) collected in parallel from 196 hospitalized children with acute respiratory infection during the peak period of influenza A and RSV activity in Hong Kong. Specimens were tested by RT-PCR for influenza A and RSV and viral load determined. They were also tested by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for influenza A and B, RSV, parainfluenza types 1-3 and adenovirus. Results: Both NPA and NPFS had excellent sensitivity (100%) for detecting influenza A by RT-PCR but NPA was slightly more sensitive than NPFS for detecting RSV by both RT-PCR (100% vs. 92.3%) and DIF (87.2% vs. 84.6%) and for detecting influenza A by DIF (90.2% vs. 82.9%). Viral load for influenza A in NPA and NPFS was not significantly different but that for RSV was higher in NPA. Conclusion: NPA remains the optimal specimen for diagnosis of respiratory infections by RT-PCR and DIF. However, collection of NPFS is easier to perform in an out-patient setting, was more acceptable to parents and less likely to generate aerosols than NPA engendering potentially less infection control hazard. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/148556 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.344 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, KH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Peiris, JSM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, W | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Nicholls, JM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, SS | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-05-29T06:13:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-05-29T06:13:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Clinical Virology, 2008, v. 42 n. 1, p. 65-69 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1386-6532 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/148556 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The quality of clinical specimens is a crucial determinant for virological diagnosis. Objectives: We compared the viral diagnostic yield for influenza A and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from the recently developed nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (NPFS) with nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) collected in parallel from 196 hospitalized children with acute respiratory infection during the peak period of influenza A and RSV activity in Hong Kong. Specimens were tested by RT-PCR for influenza A and RSV and viral load determined. They were also tested by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for influenza A and B, RSV, parainfluenza types 1-3 and adenovirus. Results: Both NPA and NPFS had excellent sensitivity (100%) for detecting influenza A by RT-PCR but NPA was slightly more sensitive than NPFS for detecting RSV by both RT-PCR (100% vs. 92.3%) and DIF (87.2% vs. 84.6%) and for detecting influenza A by DIF (90.2% vs. 82.9%). Viral load for influenza A in NPA and NPFS was not significantly different but that for RSV was higher in NPA. Conclusion: NPA remains the optimal specimen for diagnosis of respiratory infections by RT-PCR and DIF. However, collection of NPFS is easier to perform in an out-patient setting, was more acceptable to parents and less likely to generate aerosols than NPA engendering potentially less infection control hazard. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcv | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Virology | en_HK |
dc.rights | Journal of Clinical Virology. Copyright © Elsevier BV. | - |
dc.subject | Nasopharyngeal aspirates (NPA) | en_HK |
dc.subject | Nasopharyngeal flocked swabs (NPFS) | en_HK |
dc.subject | Rapid diagnosis | en_HK |
dc.subject | Respiratory viruses | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, Preschool | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Direct - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Infant | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Influenza A Virus - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nasopharynx - Virology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Parainfluenza Virus 1, Human - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Parainfluenza Virus 2, Human - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Parainfluenza Virus 3, Human - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Respiratory Syncytial Viruses - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Respiratory Tract Infections - Virology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensitivity And Specificity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Specimen Handling - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Virus Diseases - Virology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Viruses - Genetics - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in children | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Peiris, JSM: malik@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Nicholls, JM: jmnichol@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chiu, SS: ssschiu@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Peiris, JSM=rp00410 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Nicholls, JM=rp00364 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chiu, SS=rp00421 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.12.003 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18242124 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-42649112065 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 147212 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-42649112065&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 42 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 65 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 69 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000256391600011 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, KH=35338760600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Peiris, JSM=7005486823 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lim, W=7202378277 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nicholls, JM=7201463077 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chiu, SS=7202291500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1386-6532 | - |