File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.ctim.2012.02.004
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84862804303
- PMID: 22579437
- WOS: WOS:000304726600011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | The efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Adjunctive therapy Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) Colorectal cancer Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) Systematic review |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Churchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/09652299 |
Citation | Complementary Therapies In Medicine, 2012, v. 20 n. 4, p. 240-252 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Although Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been widely used as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer in Asia, its efficacy is not well defined. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of CHM as an adjunctive therapy to chemotherapy for the patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized controlled trials with CHM to treat colorectal cancer were extensively searched in seven databases. Two researchers independently assessed the quality and validity of included trials and extracted outcome data for synthesis. 20 trials were included for analysis. Compared to using chemotherapy alone, CHM combined with chemotherapy significantly increased 1- and 3-year survival rate [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-4.41; OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.49-3.87]. The combined therapy significantly slowed colorectal cancer progression (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77) and improved quality of life (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.35-5.02). It had positive effects in immunoregulation. CHM as an adjunctive therapy also had significant advantages in reducing the adverse effects of chemotherapy. This systematic review suggests that CHM as an adjunctive therapy with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone has significant efficacy in terms of prolonging survival, enhancement of tumor response, improvement of quality of life, immunoregulation, and alleviation of acute adverse effects. However, a firm conclusion could not be reached because of the poor quality of the included trials. Further trials with higher quality are required and the efficacy in other forms of advantages remains to be further determined. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/149299 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.851 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhong, LLD | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, HY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cho, WCS | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Meng, XM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tong, Y | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-22T06:35:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-22T06:35:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Complementary Therapies In Medicine, 2012, v. 20 n. 4, p. 240-252 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0965-2299 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/149299 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Although Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been widely used as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer in Asia, its efficacy is not well defined. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of CHM as an adjunctive therapy to chemotherapy for the patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized controlled trials with CHM to treat colorectal cancer were extensively searched in seven databases. Two researchers independently assessed the quality and validity of included trials and extracted outcome data for synthesis. 20 trials were included for analysis. Compared to using chemotherapy alone, CHM combined with chemotherapy significantly increased 1- and 3-year survival rate [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-4.41; OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.49-3.87]. The combined therapy significantly slowed colorectal cancer progression (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77) and improved quality of life (OR 3.43, 95% CI 2.35-5.02). It had positive effects in immunoregulation. CHM as an adjunctive therapy also had significant advantages in reducing the adverse effects of chemotherapy. This systematic review suggests that CHM as an adjunctive therapy with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone has significant efficacy in terms of prolonging survival, enhancement of tumor response, improvement of quality of life, immunoregulation, and alleviation of acute adverse effects. However, a firm conclusion could not be reached because of the poor quality of the included trials. Further trials with higher quality are required and the efficacy in other forms of advantages remains to be further determined. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Churchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/09652299 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Complementary Therapies in Medicine | en_HK |
dc.subject | Adjunctive therapy | - |
dc.subject | Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) | - |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | - |
dc.subject | Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Chemotherapy, Adjuvant | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy - mortality | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Drugs, Chinese Herbal - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Immunologic Factors - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Phytotherapy | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Quality of Life | en_HK |
dc.title | The efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive therapy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tong, Y: tongyao@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Tong, Y=rp00509 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ctim.2012.02.004 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22579437 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84862804303 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 200150 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 223917 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84862804303&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 240 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 252 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000304726600011 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zhong, LLD=55032067800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chen, HY=37051746200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cho, WCS=8615809800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Meng, XM=55043660200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tong, Y=9045384000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0965-2299 | - |