Acid treatment biasing to C/N, δ13C and δ15N of organic matter: A Molecular insight

Abstract

It is known that acid treatment methods employed to remove inorganic carbon (IC) from sample material prior to analysis for C/N, δ13C and δ15N cause non-linear, unpredictable biasing to the organic matter (OM) fraction. Consequently, measured C/N, δ13C and δ15N have an uncertainty much greater than instrument precision: uncertainties for C/N are reported in the range of 1 – 100, for δ13C in the range of 0.2 – 6.8 ‰ and for δ15N in the range of 0.2 – 1.5 ‰, in both modern and palaeo environmental materials. Brodie et al (2011) extended this investigation to a down-core lake sedimentary archive (Lake Tianyang, South China) and noted the potential for uncertainties to preclude “common” interpretations of the data (e.g., C/N values a s a n OM p rovenance tool; δ 13C as a proxy for changes in C3 and C4 vegetation). It is evident that the size of uncertainty between sample horizons varies considerably implying a differential relative reaction to acid treatment down-core (i.e., as the type, relative amount and physical state of organic and inorganic components change). We are now investigating this biasing at the molecular level by employing 13C-NMR and GCIRMS techniques on a suite of modern and palaeo environmental materials and on a lake sedimentary archive. This will provide an important insight into the effect of acid treatment on organic compounds (i.e. removal from the sample, breakdown of compounds and partial removal) and associated isotopic fractionation. From an improved understanding of the type of compounds most susceptible to alteration/removal during the acid treatment processes it will be possible to consider refinements to the acid pre-treatment process and provide information on the relative down-core changes in those compounds susceptible to change (which we may be able to glean environmental information from).