File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.006
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-80053443429
- WOS: WOS:000296954200006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: from an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process
Title | Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: from an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Construction Decision making Environmental impact assessment Infrastructural development Life cycle analysis |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint |
Citation | Habitat International, 2012, v. 36 n. 1, p. 47-56 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Many governments world-wide are increasingly encouraging the involvement of interested individuals, groups and organisations in their public infrastructure and construction (PIC) projects as a means of improving the openness, transparency and accountability of the decision-making process and help improve the projects' long-term viability and benefits to the community. In China, however, the current participatory mechanism at the project level exists only as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process. With an increasing demand for PIC projects and social equality in China, this suggests a need to bring the participatory process into line with international practice.The aim of this paper, therefore, is to identify the weaknesses of EIA-based public participation in China and the means by which it may be improved for the whole lifecycle of PIC schemes. To do this, the results of a series of interviews with a diverse group of experts is reported which analyse the nature and extent of existing problems of public participation in EIA and suggestions for improvement. These indicate that the current level of participation in PIC projects is quite limited, particularly in the crucial earlier stages, primarily due to traditional culture and values, uneven progress in the adoption of participatory mechanisms, the risk of not meeting targets and lack of confidence in public competence. Finally, a process flowchart is proposed to guide construction practitioners and the community in general. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150604 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.630 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Li, THY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ST | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Skitmore, M | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-26T06:06:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-26T06:06:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Habitat International, 2012, v. 36 n. 1, p. 47-56 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0197-3975 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/150604 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Many governments world-wide are increasingly encouraging the involvement of interested individuals, groups and organisations in their public infrastructure and construction (PIC) projects as a means of improving the openness, transparency and accountability of the decision-making process and help improve the projects' long-term viability and benefits to the community. In China, however, the current participatory mechanism at the project level exists only as part of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process. With an increasing demand for PIC projects and social equality in China, this suggests a need to bring the participatory process into line with international practice.The aim of this paper, therefore, is to identify the weaknesses of EIA-based public participation in China and the means by which it may be improved for the whole lifecycle of PIC schemes. To do this, the results of a series of interviews with a diverse group of experts is reported which analyse the nature and extent of existing problems of public participation in EIA and suggestions for improvement. These indicate that the current level of participation in PIC projects is quite limited, particularly in the crucial earlier stages, primarily due to traditional culture and values, uneven progress in the adoption of participatory mechanisms, the risk of not meeting targets and lack of confidence in public competence. Finally, a process flowchart is proposed to guide construction practitioners and the community in general. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Habitat International | en_US |
dc.subject | Construction | en_US |
dc.subject | Decision making | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental impact assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Infrastructural development | en_US |
dc.subject | Life cycle analysis | en_US |
dc.title | Public participation in infrastructure and construction projects in China: from an EIA-based to a whole-cycle process | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Li, THY: hongyangli@yahoo.cn | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, ST: tstng@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Skitmore, M: rm.skitmore@qut.edu.au | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Thomas Ng, S=rp00158 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.006 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-80053443429 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 204744 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053443429&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 36 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 47 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 56 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000296954200006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Skitmore, M=7003387239 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Thomas Ng, S=7403358853 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Li, THY=38861925000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 9494065 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0197-3975 | - |