File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?

TitleBleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?
Authors
Keywordsattachment loss
Bleeding on probing
periodontal maintenance
Issue Date1986
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1986, v. 13 n. 6, p. 590-596 How to Cite?
AbstractBleeding on probing (BOP) is a widely used criterion to diagnose gingival inflammation. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate its prognostic value in identifying sites at risk for periodontal breakdown during the maintenance phase of periodontal therapy. 55 patients who had been treated for advanced periodontitis participated in a recall system for at least 4 years, at regular intervals of 3-5 months. At the start of every appointment, BOP to the bottom of the pocket was registered at 4 sites of every tooth. A random selection of 1054 pockets was made and subdivided into 5 categories according to the incidence of BOP during the last 4 recall appointments. All pockets with a BOP incidence of 4/4 and 3/4 were selected, while only interproximal sites with a BOP incidence of 2/4, 1/4 and 0/4 were chosen. Subsequently, these categories were grouped according to whether or not the attachment level had been maintained from the time prior to the last 4 recall visits. Greater than or equal to 2 mm was defined as loss of clinical attachment. The results indicated that pockets with a probing depth of greater than or equal to 5 mm had a significantly higher incidence of BOP. Patients with 16% or more BOP sites had a higher chance of loosing attachment. Pockets with an incidence of BOP of 4/4 had a 30% chance of loosing attachment. This chance decreased to 14% with BOP of 3/4, 6% with BOP of 2/4, 3% with BOP of 1/4 and 1.5% with BOP of 0/4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153594
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.contributor.authorJoss, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrsanic, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorGusberti, FAen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiegrist, BEen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:20:33Z-
dc.date.issued1986en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology, 1986, v. 13 n. 6, p. 590-596en_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153594-
dc.description.abstractBleeding on probing (BOP) is a widely used criterion to diagnose gingival inflammation. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate its prognostic value in identifying sites at risk for periodontal breakdown during the maintenance phase of periodontal therapy. 55 patients who had been treated for advanced periodontitis participated in a recall system for at least 4 years, at regular intervals of 3-5 months. At the start of every appointment, BOP to the bottom of the pocket was registered at 4 sites of every tooth. A random selection of 1054 pockets was made and subdivided into 5 categories according to the incidence of BOP during the last 4 recall appointments. All pockets with a BOP incidence of 4/4 and 3/4 were selected, while only interproximal sites with a BOP incidence of 2/4, 1/4 and 0/4 were chosen. Subsequently, these categories were grouped according to whether or not the attachment level had been maintained from the time prior to the last 4 recall visits. Greater than or equal to 2 mm was defined as loss of clinical attachment. The results indicated that pockets with a probing depth of greater than or equal to 5 mm had a significantly higher incidence of BOP. Patients with 16% or more BOP sites had a higher chance of loosing attachment. Pockets with an incidence of BOP of 4/4 had a 30% chance of loosing attachment. This chance decreased to 14% with BOP of 3/4, 6% with BOP of 2/4, 3% with BOP of 1/4 and 1.5% with BOP of 0/4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of clinical periodontologyen_US
dc.subjectattachment loss-
dc.subjectBleeding on probing-
dc.subjectperiodontal maintenance-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshForecastingen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Hemorrhage - Diagnosis - Physiopathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshOral Hemorrhage - Diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Pocket - Diagnosis - Pathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontitis - Diagnosis - Physiopathology - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshRecurrenceen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.titleBleeding on probing. A predictor for the progression of periodontal disease?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb00852.x-
dc.identifier.pmid3489010-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0022749055en_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.spage590en_US
dc.identifier.epage596en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1986D601400007-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJoss, A=7005904584en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOrsanic, T=7801655620en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGusberti, FA=6604050465en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSiegrist, BE=6603066820en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats