File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
Title | Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs. |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1989 |
Citation | Schweizer Monatsschrift Fur Zahnmedizin = Revue Mensuelle Suisse DOdonto-Stomatologie = Rivista Mensile Svizzera Di Odontologia E Stomatologia / Sso, 1989, v. 99 n. 7, p. 777-781 How to Cite? |
Abstract | In radiology a sufficient diagnostic accuracy must be obtained with a minimal radiation dosage to which the patients are exposed. In-vitro studies designed to evaluate the influence of technical parameters on the quality of images on Kodak Ektaspeed and Kodak Ultra-Speed dental radiographs are presented. The following series of experiments were performed: 1. Evaluation of the Minray dc, Soredex and Oralix 65, Philips X-ray machines. 2. Comparison between two different Oralix 65 machines. 3. Evaluation of automatic and manual film processing as well as film-focus distances of 30 cm and 39 cm. 4. Evaluation of pairs of radiographs and their subtraction images obtained from different film and X-ray machine combinations. A dried mandible with and without bone splits within the central X-ray beam area on the alveolar crest between the teeth 46 and 47 served as object for the standardized images. A blind comparison of the series of images was performed by 3 certified periodontists. Irrespective of the film type used the highest rankings were given to the Oralix 65 X-ray machine, when the films were exposed at 39 cm from the focus and the automatic processing mode was used. X-ray images with good anatomical and technical details may be obtained on Ektaspeed and Ultra-Speed films. However, preference must be given to Ektaspeed films because of the possibility of reducing the radiation exposure. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153690 |
ISSN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nielsen, PM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weber, HP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zen Ruffinen, S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brecx, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Joss, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:21:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:21:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1989 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Schweizer Monatsschrift Fur Zahnmedizin = Revue Mensuelle Suisse DOdonto-Stomatologie = Rivista Mensile Svizzera Di Odontologia E Stomatologia / Sso, 1989, v. 99 n. 7, p. 777-781 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1011-4203 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/153690 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In radiology a sufficient diagnostic accuracy must be obtained with a minimal radiation dosage to which the patients are exposed. In-vitro studies designed to evaluate the influence of technical parameters on the quality of images on Kodak Ektaspeed and Kodak Ultra-Speed dental radiographs are presented. The following series of experiments were performed: 1. Evaluation of the Minray dc, Soredex and Oralix 65, Philips X-ray machines. 2. Comparison between two different Oralix 65 machines. 3. Evaluation of automatic and manual film processing as well as film-focus distances of 30 cm and 39 cm. 4. Evaluation of pairs of radiographs and their subtraction images obtained from different film and X-ray machine combinations. A dried mandible with and without bone splits within the central X-ray beam area on the alveolar crest between the teeth 46 and 47 served as object for the standardized images. A blind comparison of the series of images was performed by 3 certified periodontists. Irrespective of the film type used the highest rankings were given to the Oralix 65 X-ray machine, when the films were exposed at 39 cm from the focus and the automatic processing mode was used. X-ray images with good anatomical and technical details may be obtained on Ektaspeed and Ultra-Speed films. However, preference must be given to Ektaspeed films because of the possibility of reducing the radiation exposure. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d"odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia / SSO | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Evaluation Studies As Topic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mandible - Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiographic Image Enhancement - Instrumentation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiography, Dental - Instrumentation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Subtraction Technique - Instrumentation | en_US |
dc.title | Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 2692154 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0024779582 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 99 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 777 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 781 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nielsen, PM=16073167800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Weber, HP=24342574100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | zen Ruffinen, S=6504413382 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Brecx, M=7006631249 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Joss, A=7005904584 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |