File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes

TitleComparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushes
Authors
KeywordsClinical effects
Electric toothbrushing
Gingiva abrasion
Manual toothbrushing
Oral hygiene
Plaque control
Preventive dentistry
Side effects
Issue Date2001
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPE
Citation
Journal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2001, v. 28 n. 1, p. 65-72 How to Cite?
AbstractAims: The clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of 2 electrical toothbrushes (Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and the novel development Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D) were to be compared with conventional manual toothbrushing. Material and Methods: In a cross-over study, 26 dental student volunteers participated and were assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Following instruction in the use of the electric as well as manual toothbrushes, the volunteers were timed for 2 min each day to apply one electric or the manual toothbrush, respectively, during 3 experimental phases of 2 weeks. No other methods of tooth cleaning were to be performed except the one specified for the respective test period. When brushing manually, the Bass toothbrushing technique was applied. Between each test period, a recovery period of 1 week was allowed during which no oral hygiene was performed at all. At the start and the end of each of the experimental periods, the extension of plaque deposits from the gingival margin in coronal direction was assessed using the Turesky et al. modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index. Presence or absence of gingival inflammation was evaluated by bleeding and probing (BOP). The extent and severity of gingival abrasions were assessed by use of a modified method of Breitenmoser et al. and adapted by Danser et al. Results: The plaque-reducing effect was similar in all groups with the same cleaning regime. For that reason, the result of the different experimental phases with the respective cleaning modalities were collapsed. Cleaning with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric toothbrush resulted consistently in the lowest plaque scores when compared to both the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D and the manual toothbrush. Although the differences in plaque reduction were statistically significant between cleaning with Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and 3D, they were small and of questionable clinical relevance. No significant differences in plaque reductions were found between manual brushing and any of the 2 electric brushes. Gingival abrasions were least pronounced following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D electric toothbrush. However, no significant differences in gingival abrasion were encountered following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric in comparison with the manual toothbrush. Conclusions: The results of the present study have shown that in a group of dental students trained in manual brushing technique, where efficacy was similar with the 3 toothbrushes tested, there is no evidence of greater gingival abrasion with either Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra or 3D when compared with a manual brush. Copyright © Munksgaard 2001.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154142
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.249
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMantokoudis, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorJoss, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, MMen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeng, HXen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuvan, JEen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:23:29Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:23:29Z-
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical Periodontology, 2001, v. 28 n. 1, p. 65-72en_US
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154142-
dc.description.abstractAims: The clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of 2 electrical toothbrushes (Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and the novel development Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D) were to be compared with conventional manual toothbrushing. Material and Methods: In a cross-over study, 26 dental student volunteers participated and were assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Following instruction in the use of the electric as well as manual toothbrushes, the volunteers were timed for 2 min each day to apply one electric or the manual toothbrush, respectively, during 3 experimental phases of 2 weeks. No other methods of tooth cleaning were to be performed except the one specified for the respective test period. When brushing manually, the Bass toothbrushing technique was applied. Between each test period, a recovery period of 1 week was allowed during which no oral hygiene was performed at all. At the start and the end of each of the experimental periods, the extension of plaque deposits from the gingival margin in coronal direction was assessed using the Turesky et al. modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index. Presence or absence of gingival inflammation was evaluated by bleeding and probing (BOP). The extent and severity of gingival abrasions were assessed by use of a modified method of Breitenmoser et al. and adapted by Danser et al. Results: The plaque-reducing effect was similar in all groups with the same cleaning regime. For that reason, the result of the different experimental phases with the respective cleaning modalities were collapsed. Cleaning with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric toothbrush resulted consistently in the lowest plaque scores when compared to both the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D and the manual toothbrush. Although the differences in plaque reduction were statistically significant between cleaning with Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra and 3D, they were small and of questionable clinical relevance. No significant differences in plaque reductions were found between manual brushing and any of the 2 electric brushes. Gingival abrasions were least pronounced following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control 3D electric toothbrush. However, no significant differences in gingival abrasion were encountered following brushing with the Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra electric in comparison with the manual toothbrush. Conclusions: The results of the present study have shown that in a group of dental students trained in manual brushing technique, where efficacy was similar with the 3 toothbrushes tested, there is no evidence of greater gingival abrasion with either Braun Oral-B Plak Control Ultra or 3D when compared with a manual brush. Copyright © Munksgaard 2001.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CPEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Periodontologyen_US
dc.subjectClinical effects-
dc.subjectElectric toothbrushing-
dc.subjectGingiva abrasion-
dc.subjectManual toothbrushing-
dc.subjectOral hygiene-
dc.subjectPlaque control-
dc.subjectPreventive dentistry-
dc.subjectSide effects-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAnalysis Of Varianceen_US
dc.subject.meshCross-Over Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Plaque - Prevention & Controlen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGingiva - Injuriesen_US
dc.subject.meshGingival Diseases - Etiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLinear Modelsen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshPhotography, Dentalen_US
dc.subject.meshToothbrushing - Adverse Effects - Instrumentationen_US
dc.titleComparison of the clinical effects and gingival abrasion aspects of manual and electric toothbrushesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.280110.x-
dc.identifier.pmid11142669-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035218840en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035218840&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.spage65en_US
dc.identifier.epage72en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000165874400010-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMantokoudis, D=6505870723en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJoss, A=7005904584en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChristensen, MM=9533438400en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMeng, HX=7202279117en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSuvan, JE=19637686000en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0303-6979-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats