File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2004.00200.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-14944343243
- PMID: 15720575
- WOS: WOS:000227130300011
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Impact of sample storage on detection of periodontal bacteria
Title | Impact of sample storage on detection of periodontal bacteria |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization Microbiology Periodontitis Storage Subgingival plaque |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/OMI |
Citation | Oral Microbiology And Immunology, 2005, v. 20 n. 2, p. 128-130 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background/aims: Information on the impact of sample storage prior to analysis by DNA methods is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subgingival sample storage on bacterial detection and enumeration. Material and methods: Subgingival plaque samples were studied by a) checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization by immediate processing, b) storage at + 4°C for 6 weeks, c) storage at -20°C for 6 months or d) storage at -20°C for 12 months. Results: No differences in total DNA were found between protocol 1 and 2, or between protocol 3 and 4. Protocol 1 yielded 2.4 times more total bacterial DNA than did protocol 3 (P < 0.001). Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Campylobacter gracilis were detected in 21.1% of the immediately processed samples but only in 6.6% of the samples after 12 months of storage. Similar changes were noticed for Treponema denticola, which was detected in 22.3% and 9.2%, respectively. Streptococci spp., Fusobacterium nucleatum and Tannerella forsythia did not seem to be affected by storage. In contrast, the level of Campylobacter rectus detection frequency changed from 2.6% if processed immediately to 15.8% if samples were stored for 12 months. Conclusions: In longitudinal clinical studies including microbiological samples and processed with DNA-DNA hybridization methods, samples should be stored for the same period of time before processing to avoid loss of microbiological information. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154300 |
ISSN | 2011 Impact Factor: 2.807 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Katsoulis, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | HeitzMayfield, LJR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weibel, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hirschi, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Persson, GR | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:24:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:24:29Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Oral Microbiology And Immunology, 2005, v. 20 n. 2, p. 128-130 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0902-0055 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154300 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background/aims: Information on the impact of sample storage prior to analysis by DNA methods is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subgingival sample storage on bacterial detection and enumeration. Material and methods: Subgingival plaque samples were studied by a) checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization by immediate processing, b) storage at + 4°C for 6 weeks, c) storage at -20°C for 6 months or d) storage at -20°C for 12 months. Results: No differences in total DNA were found between protocol 1 and 2, or between protocol 3 and 4. Protocol 1 yielded 2.4 times more total bacterial DNA than did protocol 3 (P < 0.001). Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Campylobacter gracilis were detected in 21.1% of the immediately processed samples but only in 6.6% of the samples after 12 months of storage. Similar changes were noticed for Treponema denticola, which was detected in 22.3% and 9.2%, respectively. Streptococci spp., Fusobacterium nucleatum and Tannerella forsythia did not seem to be affected by storage. In contrast, the level of Campylobacter rectus detection frequency changed from 2.6% if processed immediately to 15.8% if samples were stored for 12 months. Conclusions: In longitudinal clinical studies including microbiological samples and processed with DNA-DNA hybridization methods, samples should be stored for the same period of time before processing to avoid loss of microbiological information. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/OMI | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Oral Microbiology and Immunology | en_US |
dc.subject | Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization | - |
dc.subject | Microbiology | - |
dc.subject | Periodontitis | - |
dc.subject | Storage | - |
dc.subject | Subgingival plaque | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Analysis Of Variance | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dna, Bacterial - Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Plaque - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Linear Models | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nucleic Acid Hybridization | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Periodontitis - Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pilot Projects | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Preservation, Biological | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Statistics, Nonparametric | en_US |
dc.title | Impact of sample storage on detection of periodontal bacteria | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2004.00200.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15720575 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-14944343243 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-14944343243&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 130 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000227130300011 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Denmark | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Katsoulis, J=8567429400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | HeitzMayfield, LJR=8234379800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Weibel, M=36742623900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hirschi, R=23988898400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Persson, GR=7101853867 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 99528 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0902-0055 | - |