File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns

TitleA systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns
Authors
KeywordsBiological complications
Complication rates
Failures
Implant dentistry
Longitudinal
Peri-implantitis
Single crowns
Success
Survival
Systematic review
Technical complications
Issue Date2008
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, v. 19 n. 2, p. 119-130 How to Cite?
AbstractThe objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on SCs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year proportions. Twenty-six studies from an initial yield of 3601 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. In a meta-analysis of these studies, survival of implants supporting SCs was 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.9-97.6%] after 5 years. The survival rate of SCs supported by implants was 94.5% (95% CI: 92.5-95.9%) after 5 years of function. The survival rate of metal-ceramic crowns, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.6-96.7%), was significantly (P=0.005) higher than the survival rate, 91.2% (95% CI: 86.8-94.2%), of all-ceramic crowns. Peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred adjacent to 9.7% of the SCs and 6.3% of the implants had bone loss exceeding 2 mm over the 5-year observation period. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.14%. After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of screw or abutment loosening was 12.7% and 0.35% for screw or abutment fracture. For supra-structure-related complications, the cumulative incidence of ceramic or veneer fractures was 4.5%. It can be concluded that after an observation period of 5 years, high survival rates for implants and implant-supported SCs can be expected. However, biological and particularly technical complications are frequent. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154501
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 5.021
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.407
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJung, REen_US
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, BEen_US
dc.contributor.authorGlauser, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorZembic, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorZwahlen, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:25:43Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:25:43Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, v. 19 n. 2, p. 119-130en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/154501-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications. An electronic MEDLINE search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies on SCs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using random-effects Poisson's regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year proportions. Twenty-six studies from an initial yield of 3601 titles were finally selected and data were extracted. In a meta-analysis of these studies, survival of implants supporting SCs was 96.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 95.9-97.6%] after 5 years. The survival rate of SCs supported by implants was 94.5% (95% CI: 92.5-95.9%) after 5 years of function. The survival rate of metal-ceramic crowns, 95.4% (95% CI: 93.6-96.7%), was significantly (P=0.005) higher than the survival rate, 91.2% (95% CI: 86.8-94.2%), of all-ceramic crowns. Peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications occurred adjacent to 9.7% of the SCs and 6.3% of the implants had bone loss exceeding 2 mm over the 5-year observation period. The cumulative incidence of implant fractures after 5 years was 0.14%. After 5 years, the cumulative incidence of screw or abutment loosening was 12.7% and 0.35% for screw or abutment fracture. For supra-structure-related complications, the cumulative incidence of ceramic or veneer fractures was 4.5%. It can be concluded that after an observation period of 5 years, high survival rates for implants and implant-supported SCs can be expected. However, biological and particularly technical complications are frequent. © 2007 Blackwell Munksgaard.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.subjectBiological complications-
dc.subjectComplication rates-
dc.subjectFailures-
dc.subjectImplant dentistry-
dc.subjectLongitudinal-
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis-
dc.subjectSingle crowns-
dc.subjectSuccess-
dc.subjectSurvival-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectTechnical complications-
dc.subject.meshCrowns - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - Adverse Effects - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Tooth - Adverse Effects - Statistics & Numerical Dataen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshPeriapical Periodontitis - Epidemiology - Etiology - Radiographyen_US
dc.subject.meshPoisson Distributionen_US
dc.subject.meshSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.titleA systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crownsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.xen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18067597-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-37849054339en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-37849054339&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage119en_US
dc.identifier.epage130en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000252120000001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridJung, RE=7201892502en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, BE=6506841442en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGlauser, R=6603539399en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZembic, A=8502939500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZwahlen, M=7004748418en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US
dc.identifier.citeulike2202805-
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats