File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk by EB virus antibody profile
Title | Assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk by EB virus antibody profile |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Citation | Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi [Chinese Journal Of Oncology], 2002, v. 24 n. 6, p. 561-563 How to Cite? |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through EB virus antibody profile by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). METHODS: EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG by ELISA and VCA/IgA by immmunoenzymatic method were detected in 121 NPC patients and 332 healthy subjects (HS) in the Pearl river estuary. RESULTS: The sensitivity rates were 85%, 83% and 79% for EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG, all three of which if combined was the highest 92%. The specificity rates were 86%, 86% and 80% for EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG, all three of which if combined was also the highest 93%. According to the level of odds ratio, nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk could be divided into 3 groups: low, moderate and high-risk groups. 93% of HS had low risk of NPC with the odds ratio 0.0 to 0.3. 0.4% of HS had high risk of NPC with the odds ratio of 137.9%. CONCLUSION: ELISA is more objective than the traditional immunoenzymatic method in the detection and diagnosis of NPC. The combination of EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG is able to evaluate the risk of NPC. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157358 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.234 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, W | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Luo, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Z | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ji, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cen, X | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zong, Y | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, W | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:49:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:49:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi [Chinese Journal Of Oncology], 2002, v. 24 n. 6, p. 561-563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0253-3766 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/157358 | - |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through EB virus antibody profile by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). METHODS: EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG by ELISA and VCA/IgA by immmunoenzymatic method were detected in 121 NPC patients and 332 healthy subjects (HS) in the Pearl river estuary. RESULTS: The sensitivity rates were 85%, 83% and 79% for EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG, all three of which if combined was the highest 92%. The specificity rates were 86%, 86% and 80% for EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG, all three of which if combined was also the highest 93%. According to the level of odds ratio, nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk could be divided into 3 groups: low, moderate and high-risk groups. 93% of HS had low risk of NPC with the odds ratio 0.0 to 0.3. 0.4% of HS had high risk of NPC with the odds ratio of 137.9%. CONCLUSION: ELISA is more objective than the traditional immunoenzymatic method in the detection and diagnosis of NPC. The combination of EBNA 1/IgA, EBNA 1/IgG and zta/IgG is able to evaluate the risk of NPC. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology] | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 And Over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Antibodies, Viral - Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens - Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Herpesvirus 4, Human - Isolation & Purification | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms - Diagnosis - Virology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Risk Factors | en_US |
dc.title | Assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk by EB virus antibody profile | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Zheng, B:bzheng@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Zheng, B=rp00353 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 12667325 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0037665892 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 561 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheng, W=23101970500 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chen, G=7406538304 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chen, H=29267451700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Luo, R=7202671104 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, Z=7501411909 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lu, Y=7405479474 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zheng, B=7201780588 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ji, M=8229413000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Liang, J=16145038900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cen, X=55230203100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wang, D=7407072857 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Zong, Y=7005203474 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wu, W=7407077602 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0253-3766 | - |