File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Nuclear risks, public engagement and trust: towards an integrated analytical framework

TitleNuclear risks, public engagement and trust: towards an integrated analytical framework
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherInternational Sustainable Development Research Society.
Citation
The 18th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference (ISDRC18), Hull, UK, 24-26 June 2012. In Abstract Book of ISDRC18, 2012, p. 70 How to Cite?
AbstractThe threats of global warming and increasingly expensive and scarce oil supplies have prompted many nations to reconsider the development of nuclear power for energy security. However little is known about how to make effective decision-making on nuclear power. This paper proposes an integrated analytical framework for understanding, explaining and proposing policy recommendations for effective nuclear power decision-making. The key questions that our study are focusing are: 1) why and to what extent public engagement and trust are relevant for nuclear decison-making; 2) how should decisions be made regarding how to engage the public? What principles, processes, procedures and mechanisms would be favourable for effective public engagement and trust building? We integrate the key insights from key social science theories concerning governance, risks, public engagement and trust, and develop an integrated analytical framework that brings together those important concepts. We suggest that nuclear risks possess special characteristics that require special need for public engagement and trust. Pubic engagement may create facilitating conditions that include representation, collaborative framework and openness in information sharing, that can enhance trustworthiness of the governments relating to nuclear decisionmaking. Those facilitating conditions are critical because they may make good nuclear decision-making more likely (though not necessarily sufficient conditions) to occur. This paper concludes by presenting a first application of the framework to empirical cases that we draw from the UK and Hong Kong. This framework will make contribution to theoretical development of the evolving theory of governance. It will also allow us to development a set of principles (check-list) and an inventory (a tool-box) of how to enhance the capacity for making effective nuclear decision-making for policy-makers, power companies, NGOs and other stakeholders.
DescriptionTrack title: 3e
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/160775

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMah, DNYen_US
dc.contributor.authorHills, PRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16T06:20:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-16T06:20:09Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 18th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference (ISDRC18), Hull, UK, 24-26 June 2012. In Abstract Book of ISDRC18, 2012, p. 70en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/160775-
dc.descriptionTrack title: 3e-
dc.description.abstractThe threats of global warming and increasingly expensive and scarce oil supplies have prompted many nations to reconsider the development of nuclear power for energy security. However little is known about how to make effective decision-making on nuclear power. This paper proposes an integrated analytical framework for understanding, explaining and proposing policy recommendations for effective nuclear power decision-making. The key questions that our study are focusing are: 1) why and to what extent public engagement and trust are relevant for nuclear decison-making; 2) how should decisions be made regarding how to engage the public? What principles, processes, procedures and mechanisms would be favourable for effective public engagement and trust building? We integrate the key insights from key social science theories concerning governance, risks, public engagement and trust, and develop an integrated analytical framework that brings together those important concepts. We suggest that nuclear risks possess special characteristics that require special need for public engagement and trust. Pubic engagement may create facilitating conditions that include representation, collaborative framework and openness in information sharing, that can enhance trustworthiness of the governments relating to nuclear decisionmaking. Those facilitating conditions are critical because they may make good nuclear decision-making more likely (though not necessarily sufficient conditions) to occur. This paper concludes by presenting a first application of the framework to empirical cases that we draw from the UK and Hong Kong. This framework will make contribution to theoretical development of the evolving theory of governance. It will also allow us to development a set of principles (check-list) and an inventory (a tool-box) of how to enhance the capacity for making effective nuclear decision-making for policy-makers, power companies, NGOs and other stakeholders.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Sustainable Development Research Society.-
dc.relation.ispartofAbstract Book of the ISDRC18en_US
dc.titleNuclear risks, public engagement and trust: towards an integrated analytical frameworken_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailMah, DNY: daphnema@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailHills, PR: phills@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHills, PR=rp00858en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros204080en_US
dc.identifier.spage70-
dc.identifier.epage70-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats