File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.024
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-82055202810
- PMID: 22061864
- WOS: WOS:000299064200036
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men: results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronic acid with risedronate
Title | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men: results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronic acid with risedronate |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bone mineral density Glucocorticoids Osteoporosis Risedronate Zoledronic acid |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bone |
Citation | Bone, 2012, v. 50 n. 1, p. 289-295 How to Cite? |
Abstract | BACKGROUND: We studied 265 men (mean age 56.4 years; range 18-83 years), among patients enrolled in two arms of a double-blind, 1-year study comparing the effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) with risedronate (RIS) in patients either commencing (prednisolone 7.5 mg/day or equivalent) (prevention arm, n=88) or continuing glucocorticoid therapy (treatment arm, n=177). METHODS: Patients received either a single ZOL 5 mg infusion or RIS 5 mg oral daily at randomization, along with calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400-1200 IU). Primary endpoint: difference in percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: percentage changes in BMD at total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN), relative changes in bone turnover markers (beta-CTx and P1NP), and overall safety. FINDINGS: In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL increased LS BMD by 4.7% vs. 3.3% for RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively. In the prevention subpopulation, bone loss was prevented by both treatments. At LS the percentage changes were 2.5% vs. -0.2% for ZOL vs. RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.1% vs. -0.4%, respectively. ZOL significantly increased lumbar spine BMD more than RIS at Month 12 in both the prevention population (p=0.0024) and the treatment subpopulation (p=0.0232) in men. In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in serum beta-CTx and P1NP relative to RIS at all time-points. In the prevention subpopulation, ZOL significantly reduced beta-CTx at all time-points, and P1NP at Month 3 (p=0.0297) only. Both treatments were well tolerated in men, albeit with a higher incidence of influenza-like illness and pyrexia events post-infusion with ZOL. INTERPRETATION: Once-yearly ZOL preserves or increases BMD within 1 year to a greater extent than daily RIS in men receiving glucocorticoid therapy. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/163422 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.179 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sambrook, PN | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Roux, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Devogelaer, JP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Saag, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, CS | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Reginster, JY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bucci-Rechtweg, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Su, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Reid, DM | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:31:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:31:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bone, 2012, v. 50 n. 1, p. 289-295 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 8756-3282 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/163422 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: We studied 265 men (mean age 56.4 years; range 18-83 years), among patients enrolled in two arms of a double-blind, 1-year study comparing the effects of zoledronic acid (ZOL) with risedronate (RIS) in patients either commencing (prednisolone 7.5 mg/day or equivalent) (prevention arm, n=88) or continuing glucocorticoid therapy (treatment arm, n=177). METHODS: Patients received either a single ZOL 5 mg infusion or RIS 5 mg oral daily at randomization, along with calcium (1000 mg) and vitamin D (400-1200 IU). Primary endpoint: difference in percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: percentage changes in BMD at total hip (TH) and femoral neck (FN), relative changes in bone turnover markers (beta-CTx and P1NP), and overall safety. FINDINGS: In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL increased LS BMD by 4.7% vs. 3.3% for RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.8% vs. 0.2%, respectively. In the prevention subpopulation, bone loss was prevented by both treatments. At LS the percentage changes were 2.5% vs. -0.2% for ZOL vs. RIS and at TH the percentage changes were 1.1% vs. -0.4%, respectively. ZOL significantly increased lumbar spine BMD more than RIS at Month 12 in both the prevention population (p=0.0024) and the treatment subpopulation (p=0.0232) in men. In the treatment subpopulation, ZOL demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in serum beta-CTx and P1NP relative to RIS at all time-points. In the prevention subpopulation, ZOL significantly reduced beta-CTx at all time-points, and P1NP at Month 3 (p=0.0297) only. Both treatments were well tolerated in men, albeit with a higher incidence of influenza-like illness and pyrexia events post-infusion with ZOL. INTERPRETATION: Once-yearly ZOL preserves or increases BMD within 1 year to a greater extent than daily RIS in men receiving glucocorticoid therapy. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bone | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Bone | en_US |
dc.subject | Bone mineral density | - |
dc.subject | Glucocorticoids | - |
dc.subject | Osteoporosis | - |
dc.subject | Risedronate | - |
dc.subject | Zoledronic acid | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Bone Density Conservation Agents - pharmacology - therapeutic use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Diphosphonates - pharmacology - therapeutic use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Etidronic Acid - analogs and derivatives - pharmacology - therapeutic use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Glucocorticoids - adverse effects - pharmacology - therapeutic use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Imidazoles - pharmacology - therapeutic use | en_US |
dc.title | Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid osteoporosis in men: results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronic acid with risedronate | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Sambrook, PN: sambrook@med.usyd.edu.au | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lau, CS: cslau@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lau, CS=rp01348 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.024 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22061864 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-82055202810 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 206736 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-82055202810&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 50 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 289 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 295 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000299064200036 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Reid, DM=35372429900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Su, G=7201359489 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | BucciRechtweg, C=35274367400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Reginster, JY=35378176800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, CS=14035682100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Saag, K=35448182000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Devogelaer, JP=35271465400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Roux, C=14054986200 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sambrook, PN=7103142193 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 9976585 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1873-2763 | - |