File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/16081625.2010.9720865
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-78449267381
- WOS: WOS:000291830100004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Do technical barriers to trade promote or restrict trade? Evidence from China
Title | Do technical barriers to trade promote or restrict trade? Evidence from China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | China's trade Coverage ratio Frequency index Non-tariff barriers Technical barriers to trade |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Publisher | City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics & Finance. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.roae.org/ |
Citation | Asia-Pacific Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 2010, v. 17 n. 3, p. 253-278 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The use of technical barriers to trade (TBT) is widespread and has increasing impact on international trade. In contrast to most other trade measures, TBT have both trade promotion and trade restriction effects. Due to their theoretical complexity and data scarcity, TBT have been considered as one of the most difficult non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to quantify. In this paper, we construct a TBT database from 1998-2006 to examine the influence of TBT imposed by China on the country's imports. When using the frequency index, we find that TBT are trade restrictive: a one unit increase in TBT will decrease import value by about 0.8%. However, when the coverage ratio is used, we find that the negative effects of TBT are not statistically significant based on the entire period. However, if the focus is shifted to data from 1998-2001, we find that TBT have trade promotion effects. A one unit increase in TBT will increase import value by about 0.2%. Finally, China's TBT (measured by both frequency index and coverage ratio) are trade restricting for agriculture goods but trade promoting for manufacturing goods. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/164724 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.318 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bao, X | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Qiu, LD | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T08:08:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T08:08:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Asia-Pacific Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 2010, v. 17 n. 3, p. 253-278 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1608-1625 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/164724 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of technical barriers to trade (TBT) is widespread and has increasing impact on international trade. In contrast to most other trade measures, TBT have both trade promotion and trade restriction effects. Due to their theoretical complexity and data scarcity, TBT have been considered as one of the most difficult non-tariff barriers (NTBs) to quantify. In this paper, we construct a TBT database from 1998-2006 to examine the influence of TBT imposed by China on the country's imports. When using the frequency index, we find that TBT are trade restrictive: a one unit increase in TBT will decrease import value by about 0.8%. However, when the coverage ratio is used, we find that the negative effects of TBT are not statistically significant based on the entire period. However, if the focus is shifted to data from 1998-2001, we find that TBT have trade promotion effects. A one unit increase in TBT will increase import value by about 0.2%. Finally, China's TBT (measured by both frequency index and coverage ratio) are trade restricting for agriculture goods but trade promoting for manufacturing goods. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | City University of Hong Kong, Department of Economics & Finance. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.roae.org/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics | en_HK |
dc.subject | China's trade | en_HK |
dc.subject | Coverage ratio | en_HK |
dc.subject | Frequency index | en_HK |
dc.subject | Non-tariff barriers | en_HK |
dc.subject | Technical barriers to trade | en_HK |
dc.title | Do technical barriers to trade promote or restrict trade? Evidence from China | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Qiu, LD: larryqiu@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Qiu, LD=rp01093 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/16081625.2010.9720865 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-78449267381 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 207605 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78449267381&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 253 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 278 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000291830100004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bao, X=36630026600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Qiu, LD=7201538008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1608-1625 | - |